LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

CJI Chandrachud expresses displeasure over different counsels mentioning same case for listing

01/10/2024BlogNo Comments

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud on Tuesday expressed his displeasure over the emerging practice of different counsels mentioning the same case for listing.

The oral observations were made in the open court after a counsel mentioned a matter relating to the lapse of a mining lease before the Bench of CJI Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra.

Noting that the matter was mentioned yesterday also, the CJI said that the lawyers need to discourage the practice of repeated mentionings of the same case to get a suitable order.

He said getting three different counsels and getting an order the moment a judge blinked, was what was happening in this Court.

Telling the lawyers not to take the Court for a ride, the CJI said that his discretionary powers would not be used to accommodate such tactics.

He further said that his credibility was at stake as people might think that the CJI was not following consistency in listing. He added that the Court must adhere to standard procedures for listing of cases.

The post CJI Chandrachud expresses displeasure over different counsels mentioning same case for listing appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court denies urgent hearing to Tamil Nadu government suit against Centre seeking release of over Rs 2291 crore under SSS
  • Supreme Court stays Madras High Court order, allows NHAI to collect toll on Madurai-Tuticorin Highway
  • Supreme Court grants interim protection from arrest to MP journalists in police violence case
  • India-Canada: Critical Partners Must Reset Diplomatic Ties
  • Lawless Ambitions, Judicial Setbacks, And A Billionaire Rebellion

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.