LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

If marital rape is to be criminalised, it is not up to the Supreme Court, says Centre

03/10/2024BlogNo Comments

The Centre lodged an affidavit before the Supreme Court opposing petitions that have called for the criminalisation of marital rape in India. In its counter-affidavit filed through advocate AK Sharma, the Union Home Ministry supported the existing Indian rape law that carves out an exception for sexual relations between a husband and wife.

The Centre remarked that the issue is more of a social than a legal one, which has a direct bearing on society in general. It further argued that even if marital rape is to be criminalised, it is not up to the Supreme Court to do so.

It added that the issue cannot be decided without proper consultation with all the stakeholders or taking the views of all the states into consideration. It mentioned that the act colloquially referred to as marital rape ought to be illegal and criminalized. The Centre stated that a woman’s consent is not obliterated by marriage, and its violation should result in penal consequences. Nonetheless, the consequences of such violations within marriage differ from those outside it.

It further mentioned that a breach of consent should be punished differently, depending on whether such an act occurs within or outside a marriage. It said that in a marriage, there is a continuing expectation to have reasonable sexual access from one’s spouse, clarifying that such expectations do not entitle a husband to coerce his wife to have sex against her will. However, it may be excessive and disproportionate to punish a man under anti-rape laws for such an act, the Centre remarked.

It also stressed that the parliament has already provided different remedies to protect a married woman’s consent within marriage. These include laws punishing cruelty to married women (Section 498A under the Indian Penal Code), laws punishing acts against the modesty of women and remedies under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The affidavit mentioned that the sexual aspect is but one of many facets of the relationship between husband and wife, on which the bedrock of their marriage rests. It added that given the nature of the marital institution in our socio-legal milieu, if the legislature is of the view that, for preservation of the marital institution, the impugned Exception should be retained, it is contended that it would not be appropriate for the Supreme Court to strike down the Exception.

The counter-affidavit was lodged in response to a batch of petitions that have called for the criminalisation of marital rape. The Centre criticised the petitioners’ approach of treating the institution of marriage as a private institution, calling this view unidimensional. It stated that the case of a married woman and her own husband cannot be treated in the exact same manner as other cases.

It said that it is up to the legislature to classify the penal consequences of sexual abuse in varying situations differently.

The Centre argued that the existing law does not disregard consent to sexual advances between spouses, but only accords a different treatment when it is within a marriage.

It maintained that this approach is also in line with Article 14 (right to equality) of the Constitution as it refuses to treat two incomparable situations (in this case, sexual relations within a marriage and those outside a marriage) as equal.

Furthermore, the Centre mentioned that it is committed to the liberty and dignity of women, and that marital rape does not need to be criminalised since there are alternative suitably tailored penal remedies.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra is currently seized of the matter.

Notably, Marital rape is excluded from the ambit of rape by way of Exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Additionally, a similar provision is also present in the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) which replaced the IPC on July 1 this year.

The Delhi High Court in 2022 delivered a split verdict on whether marital rape should be a criminal offence. The case then reached the Supreme Court in September that year.

The post If marital rape is to be criminalised, it is not up to the Supreme Court, says Centre appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court denies urgent hearing to Tamil Nadu government suit against Centre seeking release of over Rs 2291 crore under SSS
  • Supreme Court stays Madras High Court order, allows NHAI to collect toll on Madurai-Tuticorin Highway
  • Supreme Court grants interim protection from arrest to MP journalists in police violence case
  • India-Canada: Critical Partners Must Reset Diplomatic Ties
  • Lawless Ambitions, Judicial Setbacks, And A Billionaire Rebellion

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.