LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Jammu and Kashmir High Court rejects PIL against the detention of 2000 people

16/10/2024BlogNo Comments

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court has rejected a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the detention of over 2000 people and seeking directions to bring into force amendments to Article 22 of the Constitution. 

The PIL, filed by senior advocate Syed Tassadque Hussain, argued that the detainees’ rights were violated.

However, the Division Bench of Chief Justice Tashi Rabstan and Justice MA Chowdhary held that the PIL was not maintainable as 253 habeas corpus petitions had already been filed by the affected individuals, and the issue was pending adjudication. 

The court ruled that allowing the PIL would amount to double adjudication on the same issue.

The respondents, including the Union of India and the State of Jammu and Kashmir, had raised preliminary objections, citing the Apex Court’s decision in A.K. Roy vs. Union of India (1982). 

The court agreed, stating that the relief sought was not permissible under law.

The court dismissed the PIL but allowed individuals who had not challenged their detention orders under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act to approach the court.

The post Jammu and Kashmir High Court rejects PIL against the detention of 2000 people appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion
  • Between Tariffs and Trust: India’s High-Stakes Trade Reset with America
  • Judicial leadership falters when judges project perfection: CJI Surya Kant
  • Supreme Court seeks CBI status report on Manipur violence cases, considers shifting trial monitoring to High Courts

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.