LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Gauhati High Court rejects PIL against Nagaland road alignment

06/11/2024BlogNo Comments

The Gauhati High Court has recently dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition challenging the alignment of a 2-lane road in Nagaland. 

The petitioners, Vitolu Sema and Jevito Achumi, represented 17 villages, arguing that the approved alignment (Option-II) benefits only three villages, whereas the alternative alignment (Option-I) would benefit 17 villages and a population of approximately 19,000.

The National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) had recommended Option-II as more technically viable. 

The State Government approved this alignment after a joint survey technical team, comprising experts from various departments, reiterated its feasibility.

The petitioners contended that Option-II violates the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) guidelines, which prioritize development of new areas and wealth creation for less developed areas. 

They argued that the decision was arbitrary and ignored the legitimate expectations of the affected villages.

The respondents, including the State of Nagaland and NHIDCL, opposed the PIL, emphasizing that road alignment is a technical matter beyond judicial expertise. 

They cited the Supreme Court’s decisions in Essar Steel Limited v. Union of India and Project Director, Project Implementation Unit v. P.V. Krishnamoorthy, which limit judicial review in such matters.

The bench of Chief Justice Vijay Bishnoi and Justice Manish Choudhury dismissed the PIL, holding that:

1. Road alignment is within the executive domain, and courts lack expertise to interfere.

2. The State Government and NHIDCL considered and addressed local objections.

3. The petitioners failed to demonstrate violation of MoRTH guidelines or mala fides.

4. Judicial review in such matters is limited to cases of statutory violation or mala fides.

The court relied on the Supreme Court’s decisions in Union of India v. Kushala Shetty and P.V. Krishnamoorthy, emphasizing that courts should refrain from sitting as appellate authorities over expert decisions.

The post Gauhati High Court rejects PIL against Nagaland road alignment appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court declines to hear plea on Ganga Pollution in Varanasi, asks petitioner to move High Court
  • Rouse Avenue Court frames charges against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Rabri Devi in alleged Land-for-Jobs scam
  • Supreme Court refuses to stay RTI Amendment linked to Data Protection Law, agrees to examine Constitutional challenge
  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.