LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Allahabad High Court dismisses plea seeking refund of road tax paid for hybrid vehicle

12/11/2024BlogNo Comments

The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a petition seeking a direction to the respondents to refund Rs 1,74,900 to the petitioner realized as tax for his hybrid vehicle.

The Division Bench of Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Vikas Budhwar passed this order while hearing a petition filed by Ankur Vikram Singh.

The petitioner said the vehicle was purchased by the petitioner on 13.10.2022 from Noida, UP and an amount of Rs 1,74,900 was paid as One Time Tax (OTT). The vehicle was registered on 18.10.2022.

Submissions have been made that the State has issued a notification dated 2.3.2023, inter alia providing for an amendment in the UP Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997 whereby on electric vehicles purchased and registered in the State of UP from the date of notification of the Uttar Pradesh Electric Vehicle Manufacturing and Mobility Policy, 2022, tax was exempted and, therefore, the petitioner is entitled to the refund of the tax.

Counsel for the respondents made submissions that the language of the exemption notification is specific requiring the purchase and registration of the vehicle from the date of notification of the Policy, 2022 dated 14.10.2022 and as admittedly, the vehicle has been purchased prior to the said date i.e on 13.10.2022, notification is not applicable and the petitioner is not entitled to the refund.

Counsel for the petitioner attempted to make submissions that as the vehicle was registered on 18.10.2022, even if the tax was paid/ vehicle was purchased on 13.10.2022, the petitioner is entitled to the refund.

The Court observed,

A perusal of the above would reveal that the conditions enumerated for the purpose of exemption are that the electric vehicle must have been purchased and registered in the State of UP from the date of notification of the Policy, 2022 dated 14.10.2022.

Admittedly, the vehicle in question has been purchased by the petitioner prior to the date of Policy, 2022, i.e 13.10.2022 and tax itself has been paid as applicable on the said date and, therefore, it cannot be said that under the said Policy/Notification, the petitioner was entitled to the exemption as provided. Only on account of the fact that the vehicle was registered on 18.10.2022, i.e after the date as indicated in the amendment, i.e 14.10.2022, the petitioner cannot seek the refund from the respondents as the tax was paid prior to the date of the said Policy.

“It has been laid down by the Supreme Court in Star Industries V Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Raigad : (2016) 2 SCC 362 that the eligibility criteria laid down for exemption notification is required to be construed strictly.

In that view of the matter, no case for issuing directions for refund, as prayed for, is made out,” the Court further observed while dismissing the petition.

The post Allahabad High Court dismisses plea seeking refund of road tax paid for hybrid vehicle appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court declines to hear plea on Ganga Pollution in Varanasi, asks petitioner to move High Court
  • Rouse Avenue Court frames charges against Lalu Prasad Yadav and Rabri Devi in alleged Land-for-Jobs scam
  • Supreme Court refuses to stay RTI Amendment linked to Data Protection Law, agrees to examine Constitutional challenge
  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.