LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Savarkar remarks row: Pune court summons Rahul Gandhi on December 2

20/11/2024BlogNo Comments

A Pune court has summoned Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to remain present before it on December 2, in connection with a criminal defamation case filed against him for allegedly defaming late right-wing leader and Hindutva icon Vinayak Damodar Savarkar.

The order was passed by Special MP/MLA court Judge Amol Shinde on Tuesday after Advocate Milind Pawar, representing Gandhi, requested the court to adjourn the matter till December 2, assuring that his client would appear personally on the next date of hearing.

Advocate Pawar contended that Gandhi was a Member of Parliament (MP) from Rae Bareli, Uttar Pradesh and also a Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha.

Being an LoP and the leader of a national party, Gandhi had been busy travelling to various parts of the country for the past two months for campaigning as a few States in the country had been undergoing elections.

However, the MP would appear personally on the next date of hearing, the Counsel assured the Special Court, after which the judge adjourned the matter till December 2.

Earlier in October, the Special MP/MLA court had issued summons to Gandhi to appear before the court personally in connection with a defamation case filed against him by Satyaki Savarkar, the grandnephew of Vir Savarkar.

Appearing for Savarkar, Advocate Sangram Kolhatkar apprised the court that despite Gandhi’s office receiving the summons, the Congress leader chose not to appear before the court and obey the summons.

Filed under Section 500 (defamation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the complaint contended that Gandhi had repeatedly defamed Savarkar on various occasions over the years.

It mentioned a specific incident of March 5, 2023, wherein Gandhi had addressed the Overseas Congress in the United Kingdom. As per the complainant, Gandhi made intentionally wild allegations against Vir Savarkar, knowing them to be untrue, with the intention of harming Savarkar’s reputation and causing mental agony to the complainant and his family.

He further said that the defamatory speech was delivered by Gandhi in England, but its impact was felt in Pune as it was published and circulated throughout India.

The complaint further mentioned several news reports and a YouTube link to a video of Gandhi’s speech in London as evidence, claiming that Gandhi falsely accused Savarkar of writing a book in which he described beating up a Muslim person. Satyaki said Savarkar never wrote any such book and such an incident never happened. Gandhi made these false, malicious and wild allegations with the specific objective of defaming the legendary freedom fighter and harming his reputation, noted the plea.

The complainant sought maximum punishment for Gandhi under Section 500 (Punishment for defamation) of the IPC and maximum compensation as per Section 357 (Order to pay compensation) of the CrPC.

The post Savarkar remarks row: Pune court summons Rahul Gandhi on December 2 appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court appoints Justice Hrishikesh Roy as BCA ombudsman after Justice Oka declines role
  • Supreme Court seeks time-bound plan to standardize ICU facilities
  • No need for anticipatory bail in complaint cases, courts cannot direct surrender: Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court allows minor to abort 7-month pregnancy
  • Supreme Court mandates all-women SIT probe into Ghaziabad minor murder case

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.