LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of 4 judicial officers as judges in 2 High Courts

26/12/2024BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court Collegium has proposed the appointment of four judicial officers as judges, along with the elevation of a lawyer as judge, in the High Courts of Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Allahabad.

The decision was taken by the Apex Court Collegium, headed by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and comprising Justice Bhushan Ramakrishna Gavai, Justice Surya Kant, Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Justice Abhay S Oka as its members, during its meeting on December 22.

The Collegium recommended the appointment of Judicial Officer Ashish Naithani as a judge of the Uttarakhand High Court and proposed the elevation of Advocate Praveen Kumar Giri as a judge of the Allahabad High Court.

It further recommended the appointment of judicial officers – Chandra Shekhar Sharma, Pramil Kumar Mathur and Chandra Prakash Shrimali, as judges of the Rajasthan High Court.

The Rajasthan High Court, which has a sanctioned strength of 50 judges, is currently functioning with 32 judges, with a vacancy of 18.

The Allahabad High Court has a strength of 160 judges. It is currently functioning with 81 judges, with a vacancy of 79.

The Uttarakhand High Court, having a sanctioned strength of 11 judges, is currently functioning with six judges, with five vacancies.

The post Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of 4 judicial officers as judges in 2 High Courts appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Lawyer challenges Mahendra Dhoni plea seeking trademark of phrase Captain Cool
  • PM derogatory caricature case: MP High Court denies anticipatory bail to Cartoonist Hemant Malviya
  • Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind moves Delhi High Court against release of Udaipur Files
  • The Politics of Rape
  • The Court of Trump: How the Supreme Court Is Becoming a Weapon of Authoritarian Rule

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.