LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court modifies Calcutta High Court order challenging acquittal under NDPS Act

03/07/2025BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court on Wednesday modified the Calcutta High Court order that imposed cost on the Central government over its delay in filing an appeal against acquittal under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.

The Bench of Justice MM Sundresh and Justice K Vinod Chandran reduced the quantum of the cost from Rs one lakh to Rs 50,000. It further directed that the cost should be deposited by the Union government and not the officers involved in the making and filing of the appeal, as directed by the High Court.

The Apex Court passed the verdict on a petition challenging the High Court’s judgment of June 16, 2025.

A Special Court had acquitted the accused in an NDPS case under Sections 25A/29 of the Act on June 7, 2024. The Union government challenged this verdict before the High Court on March 17, 2025 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

During initial hearings, the High Court noted that the delay ordained in filing of the appeal was not sufficiently explained by the government in its application. It further observed that the petition was filed without an application seeking leave to appeal under Section 387(3) of CrPC [corresponding to Section 419(3) of BNSS].

The High Court granted opportunity to the Centre to rectify the error. The Union government filed the requisite application on June 13, 2025, followed by a detailed report explaining that the department concerned had acted in good faith in pursuing the appeal.

The High Court, however, permitted the appeal to be withdrawn and ordered payment of Rs one lakh cost.

The Centre moved the Apex Court on the grounds that the cost imposed was manifestly unjust and disproportionate to the nature of the lapse.

The top court of the country observed that the Centre filed the application after a considerable length of time. There must be either the fault of either the Union government’s lawyer or its officer.

Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General SD Sanjay requested the Court for some observations in its order on delayed appeals, conceding that there were disturbing and recurring delays in their filing despite writing to the officers. He added that the Court’s observations would help the matter.

The post Supreme Court modifies Calcutta High Court order challenging acquittal under NDPS Act appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Trump, and the “Birthday Book”: The Haunting Return of a Predator’s Legacy
  • A Resounding Rebuke
  • When POCSO Hides Within Confusion
  • India’s Tightrope in a Volatile World
  • Regaining Lost Ground?

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.