LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court orders report from CAQM after most Delhi air quality monitors fail during diwali

03/11/2025BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court of India has sought a detailed report from the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) regarding the functioning of air quality monitoring systems in Delhi, following reports that most of the city’s stations were non-operational during the Diwali period. The direction came after the Court was informed that only a small fraction of the monitoring units were active at a time when pollution levels were at their peak.

A Bench comprising Justice B. R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran issued the order while hearing ongoing proceedings concerning Delhi’s persistent air pollution crisis. The Court’s amicus curiae, advocate Aparajita Singh, informed the Bench that only nine out of thirty-seven monitoring stations were functioning during Diwali, leaving a major gap in the collection of air quality data for the period when the city experiences one of its most severe pollution spikes.

The revelation prompted the Court to express concern over the apparent lack of coordination among agencies tasked with tracking air quality. The Bench directed the CAQM to file a status report on the operational condition of all air quality monitoring stations and to explain the circumstances that led to such widespread malfunctioning during a critical time.

The Court’s order comes amid mounting criticism over the reliability of air pollution data in the capital. Multiple reports have suggested that water sprinkling operations were carried out near certain monitoring locations just before air quality readings were taken, potentially skewing the data and presenting an inaccurate picture of actual pollution levels.

The Supreme Court, which has been closely monitoring the issue of air pollution in the Delhi-NCR region for several years, reiterated that accurate data collection is essential for framing effective pollution control measures. The Bench noted that without credible monitoring, the CAQM and other government bodies cannot properly evaluate the success or failure of policies implemented to mitigate pollution.

The Court also took note of recent news coverage showing a sharp deterioration in Delhi’s Air Quality Index (AQI) immediately following Diwali festivities, with the city recording levels that reached the “severe” category across several localities. Despite restrictions on firecrackers, thick smog blanketed the capital for days, reducing visibility and triggering health advisories.

By seeking a report from the CAQM, the Supreme Court has signalled its intent to ensure accountability and transparency in the management of Delhi’s air quality systems. The Court is expected to review the CAQM’s findings in the next hearing, where it may issue further directions to both the Delhi Government and central agencies overseeing air pollution control.

The issue continues to underscore Delhi’s chronic struggle with toxic air, especially during the winter months, when factors such as stubble burning, vehicular emissions, and festive fireworks combine to create hazardous living conditions. The Supreme Court’s latest intervention reflects growing judicial frustration over repeated administrative lapses and the lack of effective enforcement despite years of monitoring and directives.

The post Supreme Court orders report from CAQM after most Delhi air quality monitors fail during diwali appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion
  • Between Tariffs and Trust: India’s High-Stakes Trade Reset with America
  • Judicial leadership falters when judges project perfection: CJI Surya Kant
  • Supreme Court seeks CBI status report on Manipur violence cases, considers shifting trial monitoring to High Courts

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.