LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court revives complainant’s appeal in 2007 Ajmer Dargah Blast Case, condoning delay under NIA Act

05/11/2025BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court of India has reinstated a criminal appeal filed by the complainant in the 2007 Ajmer Dargah blast case, setting aside a Rajasthan High Court order that had dismissed the plea due to a delay of 1,135 days. The apex court held that procedural technicalities should not override the fundamental right to justice, especially in matters concerning grave offences and national security.

The case stems from the October 11, 2007 explosion at the revered Ajmer Sharif Dargah during evening prayers, which claimed three lives and injured several others. Following an investigation by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), a Special NIA Court in Jaipur delivered its verdict in March 2017, convicting two accused while acquitting seven others.

Syed Sarwar Chishty, a Khadim (caretaker) of the Dargah and the complainant in the case, challenged the acquittals before the Rajasthan High Court on June 1, 2017. However, in May 2022, the High Court rejected his appeal on the ground that it was filed well beyond the 90-day limitation period prescribed under Section 21(5) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008.

Arguing before the Supreme Court, Chishty contended that such a strict interpretation of Section 21(5) violated his constitutional rights under Articles 14 and 21, as it effectively barred a legitimate appeal and denied access to justice. The Supreme Court found merit in his argument and ruled that while statutory time limits serve a purpose, they cannot be applied so rigidly as to defeat the essence of fair adjudication.

By condoning the delay and restoring the appeal, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed that justice should not fall victim to procedural rigidity. The case will now return to the Rajasthan High Court for a fresh hearing on its merits, ensuring that the victims and their families receive a full and fair consideration of their grievances.

The ruling carries broader significance, as it clarifies that even under special statutes like the NIA Act, the judiciary retains discretion to condone delays in the interest of justice—upholding the principle that access to appeal is a fundamental component of due process.

The post Supreme Court revives complainant’s appeal in 2007 Ajmer Dargah Blast Case, condoning delay under NIA Act appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion
  • Between Tariffs and Trust: India’s High-Stakes Trade Reset with America
  • Judicial leadership falters when judges project perfection: CJI Surya Kant
  • Supreme Court seeks CBI status report on Manipur violence cases, considers shifting trial monitoring to High Courts

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.