LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi High Court criticises Patanjali for misleading ‘Dhoka’ chyawanprash advertisement targeting rival brands

06/11/2025BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court has pulled up Patanjali Ayurved for airing an advertisement promoting its chyawanprash that appeared to discredit other brands in the market, including Dabur India Limited. The bench, comprising Justice Anish Dayal, questioned Patanjali’s messaging, particularly the line suggesting that all other chyawanprash products were “dhoka” (deceptive), calling it misleading and disparaging.

The case arose from a plea filed by Dabur India, alleging that Patanjali’s latest commercial for its chyawanprash implied that rival products were inferior or fraudulent. The ad featured Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna, with the tagline suggesting that “ordinary chyawanprash” was ineffective compared to Patanjali’s product. The Court observed that such an advertisement went beyond permissible comparative marketing and amounted to an attack on competitor credibility.

During the hearing, the Court noted that while companies are entitled to promote their own products, they must not defame or demean others in doing so. “How can you call everyone else ‘dhoka’? You can’t suggest that others are cheating consumers just because your product is different,” Justice Dayal remarked. The Court highlighted that freedom of commercial speech does not extend to making sweeping, unsubstantiated claims against competitors.

The bench also referenced earlier rulings on comparative advertising, affirming that a company may emphasize the superiority of its goods but cannot imply that competing products are substandard. It directed Patanjali to review the content of its commercial to ensure compliance with fair advertising practices and avoid statements that may mislead the public.

This development follows a series of similar cases between Dabur and Patanjali concerning product marketing and authenticity claims. The judgment reinforces that brand rivalry in India’s FMCG sector must remain within the bounds of ethical advertising, where creativity and competition coexist without misinformation or market denigration.

The post Delhi High Court criticises Patanjali for misleading ‘Dhoka’ chyawanprash advertisement targeting rival brands appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion
  • Between Tariffs and Trust: India’s High-Stakes Trade Reset with America
  • Judicial leadership falters when judges project perfection: CJI Surya Kant
  • Supreme Court seeks CBI status report on Manipur violence cases, considers shifting trial monitoring to High Courts

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.