Supreme Court judge Justice A.S. Oka expressed concern over the growing tendency to portray efforts against superstition as interference with constitutional religious rights. Speaking at a recent public event, Justice Oka observed that whenever social reformers raise their voices against irrational or harmful practices, their interventions are often misrepresented as violations of Article 25, which guarantees freedom of religion.
Justice Oka emphasized that challenging superstition is not an attack on genuine religious belief but an attempt to promote rationality and protect vulnerable communities from exploitative customs. According to him, the Constitution does not shield practices that are oppressive, regressive, or detrimental to public welfare simply because they are performed in the name of faith.
He noted that India’s social reformers have historically confronted harmful traditions whether related to caste, gender, or blind belief—and such initiatives have played a crucial role in shaping a progressive society. Equating reformist efforts with hostility toward religion, he warned, not only distorts the intent but also creates unnecessary polarisation.
Justice Oka reaffirmed the importance of constitutional morality.He also underscored that the right to practice religion is subject to public order, morality, and health. He argued that shielding superstitions under the banner of religious freedom undermines both social progress and the constitutional vision of an enlightened, reform-oriented society.
The post Criticism of superstitions misconstrued as attack on religious freedom:Justice Oka appeared first on India Legal.