LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Calcutta High Court declines to halt SIT and Inquiry commission probe into Messi event violence

23/12/2025BlogNo Comments

The Calcutta High Court has refused to interfere with the ongoing investigation into the violence and disorder reported during an event linked to football icon Lionel Messi in Kolkata, allowing the West Bengal Special Investigation Team (SIT) and a state-appointed inquiry commission to continue their work.

A Division Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Partha Sarathi Sen held that there was no sufficient ground at this stage to justify court intervention or to transfer the probe to a central agency. The Bench noted that both the criminal investigation and the administrative inquiry are still underway and have not shown any apparent irregularity warranting judicial interference.

The petitions before the Court had sought a CBI investigation, citing alleged mismanagement, crowd control failures, and misuse of state machinery during the event, which reportedly saw chaos and injuries. Concerns were also raised about ticket pricing, security arrangements, and alleged preferential treatment to certain individuals.

Petitioners argued that the state-constituted SIT and inquiry panel lacked independence, as the officials under scrutiny belonged to the same administrative setup. They further questioned the legitimacy of the inquiry commission.

Rejecting these submissions, the High Court observed that investigation is primarily the domain of the police, and courts should refrain from transferring probes unless there is clear material indicating bias, mala fides, or serious procedural lapses. The Bench also noted that the inquiry commission had been constituted through a valid government notification and was legally empowered to proceed.

The Court declined to grant interim relief and directed the West Bengal government and event organisers to file their affidavits within a stipulated period. The matter has been listed for further consideration on a later date.

The post Calcutta High Court declines to halt SIT and Inquiry commission probe into Messi event violence appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion
  • Between Tariffs and Trust: India’s High-Stakes Trade Reset with America
  • Judicial leadership falters when judges project perfection: CJI Surya Kant
  • Supreme Court seeks CBI status report on Manipur violence cases, considers shifting trial monitoring to High Courts

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.