LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Bombay High Court criticises litigants for blaming lawyers for delays without taking action

21/01/2026BlogNo Comments

The Bombay High Court has cautioned litigants against routinely attributing delays in legal proceedings to their lawyers without taking any concrete steps against them. The Court made these observations while declining to condone a delay of over 200 days in filing a first appeal.

Justice Jitendra Jain noted that it has become common for parties to shift blame onto advocates when procedural timelines are missed, yet they neither implead the concerned lawyers in the proceedings nor initiate any disciplinary or legal action. The Court observed that such allegations, when unsupported by action or evidence, cannot be accepted as a valid explanation for delay.

Emphasising the responsibility of litigants to remain vigilant about their cases, the Court stated that merely accusing a lawyer of negligence is insufficient. If a party genuinely believes that an advocate’s conduct caused prejudice, appropriate steps must be taken, including pursuing remedies available under law.

The ruling underscores that litigants cannot seek leniency from courts while failing to demonstrate accountability, and that diligence in following up on one’s own case is an essential obligation in the justice process.

The post Bombay High Court criticises litigants for blaming lawyers for delays without taking action appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court dismisses Congress MLA Rajendra Bharti plea challenging conviction in cooperative bank fraud case
  • Supreme Court slams Maharashtra over inaction in 2022 murder case
  • Bombay High Court orders removal of fake online content against Preity Zinta in personality rights suit
  • Litigant removed from Supreme Court after allegedly abusing bench, throwing case papers during hearing
  • Delhi High Court sentences actor Rajpal Yadav to three-month imprisonment in cheque bounce cases

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.