LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Haryana informs Supreme Court it will not pursue prosecution against Ali Khan Mahmudabad over Facebook Post

16/03/2026BlogNo Comments

The State of Haryana has informed the Supreme Court of India that it does not intend to grant sanction to prosecute Ali Khan Mahmudabad in connection with his Facebook posts concerning “Operation Sindoor.”

The statement was made during the hearing of Mahmudabad’s petition challenging the criminal proceedings initiated against him over two social media posts discussing the operation. The matter came before a Bench led by Surya Kant along with Joymalya Bagchi.

During the proceedings, the State informed the Court that although a chargesheet had been filed in the case, it had decided not to grant the statutory sanction required to proceed with prosecution. Under criminal law, such approval from the competent authority is necessary before a trial court can formally take cognisance of certain offences. Without this sanction, the prosecution cannot move forward.

The Bench noted that if the State ultimately declines to grant sanction, the proceedings against Mahmudabad would effectively come to an end. At the same time, the Court remarked that any decision by the government to refrain from prosecution should be matched with responsible conduct by the individual concerned, particularly in public discourse.

The case arose from two First Information Reports registered in Haryana’s Sonipat district after Mahmudabad posted comments on Facebook relating to Operation Sindoor. The posts were alleged to have attracted provisions concerning threats to national sovereignty and related offences.

Earlier in the proceedings, the Supreme Court had granted Mahmudabad interim protection from coercive action while allowing the investigation to continue. The Court had also directed that the inquiry remain confined strictly to the allegations contained in the original FIRs.

With the State now indicating that it does not intend to provide sanction for prosecution, the case may not proceed further unless the government revisits its position.

The post Haryana informs Supreme Court it will not pursue prosecution against Ali Khan Mahmudabad over Facebook Post appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • West Bengal voter roll revision: EC sets up 19 Tribunals for appeals under Supreme Court oversight
  • Newshounds on social media watch out! Govt proposes amendments to IT Rules that may impact them
  • West Bengal elections: Calcutta HC dismisses PIL challenging ECI transfer of bureaucrats, police officers
  • Vedanta approaches Supreme Court over Adani’s Jaiprakash Associates resolution plan
  • Andhra Pradesh High Court clarifies Property Rights in absence of children under Hindu Succession Act

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.