In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court recently declined to entertain a petition seeking a court-monitored investigation into alleged bribery by Adani Green Energy Limited, holding that the plea amounted to a misuse of judicial process. The decision underscores the judiciary’s cautious approach when allegations are not supported by timely or independent evidence.
The case was brought before a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Suman Shyam. The petitioner, Jitendra P. Maru, had sought directions for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to register a First Information Report under the Prevention of Corruption Act. He alleged that Adani Green Energy and its associates had paid substantial bribes to secure solar power contracts across multiple States in India.
The allegations were largely based on materials originating from proceedings in the United States, including a criminal indictment and related regulatory actions pending before a federal court in New York. The petitioner argued that these documents revealed a coordinated scheme involving unlawful payments to officials in connection with power purchase agreements.
However, the High Court was not persuaded by these submissions. It noted that the petition relied heavily on foreign proceedings and media reports, without presenting independent or contemporaneous evidence before Indian authorities. The Bench also observed that there had been a substantial delay in approaching the Court, despite the alleged acts dating back several years.
In its ruling, the Court emphasised that merely making allegations does not entitle a petitioner to demand a criminal investigation. It held that the writ petition failed to establish sufficient grounds for invoking the Court’s extraordinary jurisdiction. Consequently, the Bench characterised the plea as an “abuse of the process of the Court” and dismissed it.
The judgment reflects a broader judicial principle that courts must guard against being used as forums for speculative or belated claims, particularly when such claims are founded primarily on external proceedings rather than substantiated domestic evidence. It also reinforces the idea that investigative mechanisms cannot be set in motion solely on the basis of unverified allegations.
At a larger level, the decision highlights the complexities of transnational allegations in corporate and regulatory matters. While global investigations and foreign legal proceedings may have persuasive value, Indian courts continue to insist on credible and legally admissible material before directing domestic investigative agencies to act.
In conclusion, the Bombay High Court’s ruling serves as a reminder that the integrity of judicial processes must be preserved by ensuring that litigation is grounded in genuine grievance and supported by concrete evidence. The dismissal of the plea not only provides relief to Adani Green Energy Limited but also reiterates the limits of judicial intervention in matters lacking substantive foundation.
The post Bombay High Court dismisses plea against Adani Green Energy, terms it an abuse of process appeared first on India Legal.