LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi High Court backs Government action on LPG supply, rejects PIL against export policy

22/04/2026BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court has refused to entertain a public interest litigation(PIL) alleging black marketing and a severe shortage of LPG cylinders in the National capital, observing that such issues fall within the domain of the executive.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia held that it could not issue directions to ensure the supply of LPG cylinders. The Chief Justice remarked that courts cannot pass orders that are inherently non-executable, noting that a general direction against black marketing or hoarding would be impractical to enforce.

The bench observed that directing the government in such matters would be akin to issuing unrealistic mandates, such as eradicating poverty within a fixed timeframe. Emphasising that the obligations of the government and oil companies depend on available resources, the Bench questioned the feasibility of issuing such directions.

The petitioner, Advocate Rakesh Kumar Mittal, contended that LPG cylinders, which ordinarily cost around ₹1,000, were being sold on the black market for over ₹5,000. He also pointed to a recent shortage in the High Court canteen and alleged that the government was permitting export of gas despite domestic scarcity.

In response, the Bench noted that the canteen’s supply had already been restored. Justice Karia observed that the government was actively taking steps to address the situation, and courts cannot issue a writ of mandamus when remedial action is already underway. He added that judicial intervention is warranted only in cases of inaction.

Addressing the contention regarding gas exports, the Court clarified that economic policy decisions lie beyond the scope of judicial review.

Disposing of the petition, the Court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the government with his concerns. It directed that any such representation be duly considered by the authorities, who must pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

The post Delhi High Court backs Government action on LPG supply, rejects PIL against export policy appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court judge Justice Tejas Karia recuses himself from case related to recording of court proceedings
  • TCS case: Nashik court denies anticipatory bail to Danish Shaikh
  • Supreme Court entitles accident victims to prosthetic maintenance
  • NIA tells Delhi High Court Yasin Malik used Pakistan links to push Kashmir secession; defence says peace outreach
  • Supreme Court rejects maintenance claim against non-biological father

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.