LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Gauhati High Court rejects Pawan Khera’s anticipatory bail plea in defamation and forgery case

24/04/2026BlogNo Comments

The Gauhati High Court has today dismissed Congress leader Pawan Khera’s plea for anticipatory bail in a case registered by the Assam Police’s Crime Branch in Guwahati.

Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia had reserved orders on April 21 and pronounced the decision today, rejecting the bail.

The Legal proceedings have been initiated against Khera following an FIR alleging conspiracy, forgery, and defamatory statements. It stems from his recent claims that Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife, Riniki Bhuyan, possesses multiple foreign passports and undisclosed overseas assets.

Assam Police had earlier visited Khera’s Delhi residence on April 7, but he was not present. He subsequently approached the Telangana High Court, which on April 10 granted him one week’s transit anticipatory bail to enable him to seek relief before courts in Assam.

However, on April 15, the Supreme Court stayed the Telangana High Court’s order in an appeal filed by the Assam government. Khera challenged this ex-parte stay and sought an extension of transit protection, but the apex court declined both requests, directing him instead to approach the Gauhati High Court.

Before the High Court, Khera argued that the allegations arose from statements made during a press conference in a public and political context, which were selectively interpreted to initiate criminal proceedings. He contended that the FIR was driven by political vendetta and constituted an abuse of legal process, aimed at harassment and intimidation at the instance of the complainant, who is the Chief Minister’s wife.

Khera further submitted that his remarks were framed in an interrogatory manner and that he had no role in the alleged fabrication of passports or property documents.

The post Gauhati High Court rejects Pawan Khera’s anticipatory bail plea in defamation and forgery case appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court allows minor to abort 7-month pregnancy
  • Supreme Court mandates all-women SIT probe into Ghaziabad minor murder case
  • Supreme Court appreciates record voter turnout in West Bengal
  • Delhi High Court upholds bail for Ishrat Jahan in 2020 riots conspiracy case
  • The Delhi High Court orders police protection for family of youth killed in Uttam Nagar Holi Clash

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.