LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi High Court issues summons to Centre, X on Shashi Tharoor plea seeking protection of personality rights

08/05/2026BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court on Friday issued summons to the Union government and social media intermediaries, including Meta and X, on a civil suit filed by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor seeking protection of his personality and publicity rights against alleged unauthorised misuse of his name, image, likeness and identity across digital and online platforms.

The single-judge Bench of Justice Mini Pushkarna said that it would pass interim directions for the removal of alleged deepfake videos depicting Tharoor praising Pakistan, while also extending protection to his personality and publicity rights against unauthorised digital misuse. The High Court directed the respondents to file their replies within four weeks and orally observed that blocking and removal directions would be passed on Tharoor’s civil suit seeking takedown of allegedly fabricated and AI-generated content circulated online.

Appearing for Tharoor, Senior Advocate Amit Sibal submitted that several hyper-realistic deepfake videos had surfaced across multiple URLs falsely attributing politically sensitive statements to the Congress leader. It was argued that the content had been generated through artificial intelligence and machine learning tools capable of replicating Tharoor’s face, voice, speech patterns and mannerisms with high accuracy.

According to the plaint, the manipulated videos falsely portrayed Tharoor as praising Pakistan’s diplomatic strategy and foreign policy. The suit alleged that the fabricated content amounted to misappropriation of personality rights, reputational injury, dissemination of misinformation and unlawful interference with democratic and electoral processes.

The plaintiff further contended that despite complaints being made under the Information Technology Rules and certain URLs being taken down, identical content repeatedly resurfaced through different links and accounts. It was argued that the recurring publication of such material demonstrated the need for dynamic injunctions and continuing monitoring mechanisms against future uploads.

Senior counsel submitted that fact-checking agencies and media organisations had already identified the videos as fake, yet the content continued to circulate widely, allegedly causing reputational harm, public confusion and mental distress. It was further argued that such manipulated content could potentially impact India’s diplomatic standing and be misused by foreign entities.

Counsel appearing for [Meta](https://about.meta.com/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) informed the Court that the Instagram URLs identified in the plaint had already been disabled and rendered inaccessible. The platform further stated that basic subscriber information and IP-related details associated with the infringing accounts could be furnished in accordance with the law.

The Court indicated that it would pass a standard dynamic injunction order enabling the plaintiff to approach platforms for the removal of future infringing links containing identical content. The Bench also took note of the recurring nature of AI-generated impersonation and online identity misuse.

Tharoor has instituted the proceedings against multiple identified and unidentified defendants, including John Doe parties. The suit invokes legal principles relating to personality rights, privacy rights, passing off, misappropriation of identity, reputational protection and intermediary liability under the Information Technology framework.

The Delhi High Court has, in recent years, developed substantial jurisprudence recognising and protecting personality rights of public figures against unauthorised commercial exploitation, AI-generated manipulation and digital impersonation. Similar protective orders have previously been granted in favour of Aman Gupta, Allu Arjun, Mohanlal, Jubin Nautiyal, Pawan Kalyan, Sunil Gavaskar, Kajol, R. Madhavan, Salman Khan and Sudhir Chaudhary, among others.

The post Delhi High Court issues summons to Centre, X on Shashi Tharoor plea seeking protection of personality rights appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • No complete closure of Delhi Metro on October 10: Supreme Court asks authorities to ensure public transport
  • Supreme Court receives fresh plea challenging Centre’s six-stanza Vande Mataram mandate
  • Supreme Court hears plea against Delhi Metro curbs, train cancellations ahead of protest seeking CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s removal
  • Supreme Court dismisses PIL seeking independent probe into Jantar Mantar protest FIRs, says plea seeks review of earlier order
  • Supreme Court rejects Andhra Pradesh’s challenge to quashing of 34% backward class quota in local body polls

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.