LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Mamata defends Bengal government before Calcutta High Court in post-poll violence case

14/05/2026BlogNo Comments

Appearing before the Calcutta High Court in connection with pleas concerning alleged post-election violence in the state, Mamata Banerjee defended her administration and asserted that West Bengal was ‘not a bulldozer state’. She also maintained that the police were functioning strictly within the bounds of the law.

Appearing in connection with the public interest litigations, Banerjee told the court that allegations claiming police were refusing to register FIRs were not entirely accurate. She argued that law enforcement agencies were examining complaints and taking action wherever necessary under established legal procedures.

The remarks came as the High Court continued hearing multiple pleas seeking intervention over incidents of violence allegedly reported after elections in different parts of the state. Petitioners have accused local authorities of failing to protect victims and of not promptly acting on complaintt.

The former Chief Minister, however, defended her government’s handling of the situation, stating that West Bengal could not be compared to states where demolition drives and aggressive administrative action had become common. She stressed that the administration was committed to maintaining law and order while also ensuring that legal safeguards were followed.

The post Mamata defends Bengal government before Calcutta High Court in post-poll violence case appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi Excise Policy case: High Court initiates contempt proceedings over derogatory posts
  • Robert Vadra concealed facts in Gurugram land case: ED tells Delhi High Court
  • Bar Council of India seeks clarity on Mamata Banerjee’s standing as an advocate
  • Supreme Court declines to recognise Mizo chieftains land claims, dismisses plea seeking privy purse equivalence
  • Delhi High Court vacates interim protection granted to The Wire editor over suppression of Allahabad High Court bail conditions

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.