The Supreme Court has prima facie observed that a matrimonial dispute cannot be transferred to a special court designated to deal with cases involving Members of Parliament and Legislative Assemblies merely because one of the parties to the dispute is an elected legislator.
A Bench of the Supreme Court made the observation while considering a matter concerning the jurisdiction of a special MP/MLA court to deal with a matrimonial dispute involving a sitting legislator.
The Court questioned whether the mere fact that one party to a matrimonial proceeding is an MP or MLA would, by itself, confer jurisdiction on a special court constituted to hear criminal cases against lawmakers.
The Bench indicated that the designation of special courts for cases involving MPs and MLAs was intended to ensure the expeditious adjudication of criminal proceedings against elected representatives. The Court therefore examined whether such a forum could automatically assume jurisdiction over a matrimonial dispute simply because one of the parties held legislative office.
The issue arose in the context of a dispute in which proceedings had been placed before an MP/MLA court. The Supreme Court is examining whether the nature of the proceedings and the statutory framework governing the special court permit such a transfer or listing.
The Court’s prima facie view underscores that the jurisdiction of a special court cannot be determined solely by the status of a litigant. Instead, the nature of the proceedings and the legal provisions under which the court has been constituted would also have to be considered.
The matter remains pending before the Supreme Court for further consideration.
The post Supreme Court observes being an MP/MLA alone does not make matrimonial dispute triable by special courts appeared first on India Legal.