LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

NEET paper leak protests: Bihar Congress leader moves Supreme Court seeking FIR details, protection for students from coercive action

30/07/2026BlogNo Comments

A Bihar Congress functionary has approached the Supreme Court seeking to intervene in proceedings concerning alleged excessive use of force against students protesting over the NEET examination paper leak controversy.

Dr Abul Farah Shazli, District Secretary of the District Congress Committee in Saharsa, has filed an application in the writ petition instituted by Rajya Sabha MP Dr Manoj Kumar Jha. The application supports the principal petition’s plea for an independent examination of allegations concerning police excesses against student demonstrators.

The intervention application seeks disclosure of the FIRs registered against students in connection with protests held between July 20 and July 25. It calls for details including the identities of those arraigned, the offences invoked against them and other relevant particulars.

The applicant has also backed the plea seeking safeguards against intimidation, detention or other coercive measures against students merely for having participated in the demonstrations.

The proceedings arise against the backdrop of protests across several parts of the country over alleged irregularities in competitive examinations and the NEET paper leak controversy. The petitioner has contended that peaceful assembly and protest form part of the constitutional framework and that allegations of disproportionate police action must be subjected to an impartial and transparent inquiry.

The intervention application emphasises the importance of preserving public confidence in the rule of law where allegations of excessive force by law-enforcement authorities have been raised. It also seeks preservation of relevant electronic and digital material, including recordings that may assist an eventual investigation.

The Supreme Court had on July 28 passed interim directions concerning preservation of CCTV footage, drone recordings, body-camera footage and other digital evidence relating to the protests.

The main petition has sought broader directions to States and Union Territories, including disclosure of FIR-related information concerning students who participated in the demonstrations. It also seeks measures to prevent authorities from allegedly documenting, threatening, intimidating or detaining students for taking part in protests.

Additionally, the petition seeks formulation of uniform national standards and standard operating procedures governing the use of force during public demonstrations.

The latest application has been filed in the context of continuing controversy over police action during student protests in Bihar and other parts of the country. The applicant has stated that the intervention is intended to assist the Court in examining the issues already raised before it, rather than enlarging the scope of the pending proceedings.

The applicant is represented before the Supreme Court by Advocates Aarati Sah and Animesh Shukla.

The matter is part of the wider judicial scrutiny surrounding the handling of student demonstrations and the balance between maintaining public order and protecting the constitutional right to peaceful protest.

The post NEET paper leak protests: Bihar Congress leader moves Supreme Court seeking FIR details, protection for students from coercive action appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • The Discipline of Recusal: Preserving Judicial neutrality and Institutional faith
  • BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra rejects resignation demand, calls allegations ‘political vendetta’
  • Right to marry is a human right: Madras High Court urges reform of Hindu marriage law to ease remarriage
  • Strongest Economies will be those whose Courts honour promises: CJI at BRICS+ legal forum
  • CJI hails Justice Sanjay Karol as a Judge who saw what the Law would overlook

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.