LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi High Court flags critical medical equipment lying idle across Government hospitals

13/08/2026BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court expressed shock after being informed that 400 ventilators and 910 oxygen concentrators are lying unused at Guru Teg Bahadur (GTB) Hospital.

A bench comprising Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora was informed that the equipment had been procured or donated during the COVID-19 pandemic and was now considered surplus. The equipment is part of a larger inventory of critical medical equipment lying unused across 26 government hospitals in Delhi.

The Bench also noted that GTB Hospital’s ECG machine was non-functional and that the report did not mention the availability of any other ECG machine, effectively leaving the hospital without a functioning ECG facility.

The Delhi State Cancer Institute was also flagged for having a large quantity of equipment meant for cancer diagnosis and treatment lying unused. Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital and Ch Brahm Prakash Ayurved Charak Sansthan were similarly found to have a substantial portion of their equipment and machines lying idle.

The Court was hearing a suo motu matter concerning the functioning of government hospitals in Delhi. On July 3, it had directed the hospitals to provide details of equipment purchased but not put to use.

The Delhi Government subsequently placed a detailed list before the Court, attributing the non-utilisation of equipment primarily to a shortage of technically qualified manpower. In some cases, equipment was also reportedly unusable due to missing accessories or essential components. The Court expressed particular concern over specialised cancer equipment lying unused despite the substantial investment involved.

The Court criticized the failure to utilize critical cancer diagnosis and treatment equipment, pointing out that significant public money was spent on high-end machines from globally renowned manufacturers only to let them sit idle.

The Court directed the Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, and the Secretary, Services, of the Delhi Government to hold a joint meeting with the medical superintendents and directors of all 26 hospitals on August 17.

The meeting will address shortages of technically qualified manpower, disposal of condemned equipment, redistribution of unused equipment among hospitals, recruitment timelines and coordination with manufacturers for missing accessories and components.

The Court was also informed about an earlier incident involving a patient, Kamar Jahan, who was allegedly denied an ICU bed at Lok Nayak Jaya Prakash Hospital despite the e-HMIS portal showing availability. The Court was subsequently informed that the patient had been admitted and was receiving treatment.

Regarding a surprise audit by the National Informatics Centre (NIC) of the NextGen e-HMIS system across 38 hospitals, the Court directed that the findings be shared with the respective hospitals for their comments.

The Court also sought clarity from the Delhi Government regarding its proposal to use the existing CATS toll-free helpline for ICU bed and emergency-related enquiries, as well as the proposed role of a “Referral Coordinator” for inter-hospital referrals.

The matter will next be heard on September 18.

The post Delhi High Court flags critical medical equipment lying idle across Government hospitals appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Aaradhya Bachchan Case: Delhi High Courtr weighs the legal limits of a famous family’s reputation
  • Supreme Court to FSSAI: Ensure consumers know what they are eating, decide on warning labels in two weeks
  • Supreme Court backs Railway travel concessions for acid attack survivors, Centre to frame policy
  • Delhi High Court flags critical medical equipment lying idle across Government hospitals
  • Supreme Court decries mini-trial at interim injunction stage, restores single judge’s order

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.