LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

CJP’s Delhi march: Supreme Court says law and order concerns for Government to address

31/08/2026BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to issue urgent directions on a plea raising concerns over the Cockroach Janta Party’s proposed protest march in Delhi on September 5.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana said it could not presume, at this stage, that the planned protest would lead to a law-and-order problem.

The Court said it had no reason to doubt that those involved would act responsibly, peacefully and within the law. It advised the applicant, retired Delhi Police officer Rajender Singh, to approach the Central government with his concerns.

The CJP has called for a march from India Gate to Delhi Police Headquarters, alleging that the Union government failed to fulfil assurances made on July 25, including on the withdrawal of cases against protesters. The group had earlier withdrawn its Jantar Mantar agitation over examination paper leaks following government assurances.

Singh moved the Supreme Court seeking directions against protests in Lutyens’ Delhi without official permission. His counsel, Advocate Rizwan, argued that the march could create law-and-order concerns, particularly as it was planned around the 18th BRICS Summit and the presence of international delegates in the Capital.

The Bench said the application could be placed before the Solicitor General and the High-Powered Committee constituted by the Court to address issues arising from CJP protests. It added that the matter would be heard in detail on September 10 along with other pending petitions relating to the protests.

The Court reiterated that maintaining law and order was the responsibility of the Union and Delhi governments, and that the police could independently determine what was permissible under the law.

The Cockroach Janta Party has been associated with protests over alleged examination paper leaks and demands for action against those responsible. Its earlier agitation at Jantar Mantar was withdrawn after the government reportedly gave assurances, including regarding the handling of cases filed against protesters.

The proposed September 5 march is intended to press for implementation of those assurances. However, the timing has drawn objections because it coincides with heightened security arrangements in Delhi ahead of the BRICS Summit.

The Supreme Court has previously constituted a High-Powered Committee to examine issues arising out of CJP-related protests. In the present case, the Court has chosen not to intervene urgently, holding that concerns about the proposed march should first be addressed by the relevant governments and law-enforcement authorities.

The post CJP’s Delhi march: Supreme Court says law and order concerns for Government to address appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice opts out of hearings amid lawyers protests
  • Akbaruddin Owaisi speech prima facie intended to mock Lord Ram, hurt religious sentiments: Bombay High Court refuses to quash proceedings
  • Centre moves Supreme Court to quash FIRs against student protesters under Article 142
  • Supreme Court seeks explanation over delay in sanction to prosecute Kunwar Vijay Shah for Col. Sofiya Qureshi remark
  • Supreme Court asks Centre to consider ban or strict regulation of retail acid sales

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.