LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

CJP calls off Delhi march scheduled for September 5 as Centre moves to quash FIRs

01/09/2026BlogNo Comments

The proposed September 5 march in Delhi by the CJP has been called off after the Centre moved to initiate proceedings for quashing the FIRs that had triggered the political and legal controversy.

The development marks a significant turn in a dispute that had steadily acquired a wider political dimension, with the proposed mobilisation in the National capital emerging as a focal point of confrontation between the CJP and the authorities.

The decision to withdraw the march followed the Centre’s move before the Supreme Court seeking an end to the criminal proceedings arising from the matter. The government’s stance has effectively opened a route towards de-escalation, prompting the CJP to reconsider its proposed street mobilisation.

The planned march had assumed considerable significance amid heightened political rhetoric surrounding the FIRs. The CJP had announced the Delhi programme as part of its campaign against what it had described as the action taken against its members and supporters.

With the Centre now moving towards quashing the FIRs, the immediate prospect of a large-scale demonstration in Delhi has receded.

The episode is significant against the backdrop of the increasingly contentious interface between political mobilisation and criminal proceedings. The decision to seek quashing of the FIRs could potentially provide political stakeholders with an opportunity to step back from an escalating confrontation and pursue a more institutional resolution.

The Centre’s move is also likely to be viewed as an attempt to contain the political temperature surrounding the issue. By seeking judicial closure of the FIRs, the government has signalled a willingness to address the immediate legal flashpoint rather than allow the dispute to become a catalyst for further mobilisation.

For the CJP, calling off the march represents a strategic recalibration of its political course. The decision allows the organisation to claim that its pressure campaign has yielded movement from the government while simultaneously avoiding a potentially charged confrontation on the streets of the national capital.

The matter, however, remains subject to the outcome of the judicial process concerning the FIRs. The Centre’s move to seek their quashing will have to pass through the requisite legal scrutiny before the proceedings can attain finality.

The development therefore brings a temporary pause to the political confrontation, while placing the focus squarely on the judicial proceedings that will determine the fate of the criminal cases.

The withdrawal of the September 5 march could consequently serve as an opening for political dialogue and institutional engagement, even as the underlying differences between the parties remain unresolved.

The post CJP calls off Delhi march scheduled for September 5 as Centre moves to quash FIRs appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • NCERT textbook row: Supreme Court clarifies remarks on academicians, recalls earlier adverse observations, closes suo motu case
  • CJP calls off Delhi march scheduled for September 5 as Centre moves to quash FIRs
  • Prof Upendra Baxi: University of Sydney confers Honorary Doctorate for legal scholarship, social justice work on scholar
  • Delhi High Court seeks response by Meta over blocking facebook page of Srinagar MP Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi
  • Allahabad High Court: DRDA employees cannot claim regularisation under UP’s 2016 rules

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.