LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Calcutta High Court secures no-coercive-action assurance for Anandabazar Patrika journalists in ‘saffron hooliganism’ FIRs

03/09/2026BlogNo Comments

The Calcutta High Court on Thursday sought an assurance from the State that no coercive action would be taken against journalists of Anandabazar Patrika facing FIRs over the newspaper’s use of the phrase “Gerua Gundami” or “saffron hooliganism”, provided they cooperate with notices issued to them.

The assurance was given by Additional Advocate General Rajdeep Mazumdar after Senior Advocate S N Mookherjee, assisted by Advocates Arunabha Deb and Ashika Daga, brought the FIRs registered against the journalists to the Court’s attention.

Mookherjee submitted that the cases had been initiated on allegations of incitement, as though the journalists had demeaned sanyasis across the country. He stated that the case was filed for incitement, as though they had insulted all monks in the country. He also informed the Court that his office had been painted saffron by protestors.

The Court asked Mookherjee if he was familiar with the term “saffron vandalism,” to which he replied that he was, adding that his father had been a member of the saffron brigade. After the Court pointed to the newspaper’s front page, Mookherjee clarified that the case wasn’t about politics, but about protecting journalists.

When the Additional Advocate General asked whether being journalists gave them the right to do anything they wanted, Mookherjee countered that he was not claiming special privileges, only the standard rights of an ordinary citizen.

The Court then sought an assurance that no action would be taken against the journalists until the matter was considered. The State agreed, subject to the journalists complying with the notices served on them.

Opposing blanket protection, the AAG assured the Court that no coercive steps would be taken before the next hearing, provided the journalists complied with the notices. The Court echoed this, instructing the journalists to cooperate with the investigation.

The AAG reiterated that no coercive steps would be taken as long as the journalists cooperated. Mookherjee, in turn, assured the Court that they would comply with the notices before the matter was taken up for hearing.

The FIRs were registered following objections to the use of the phrase “Gerua Gundami” (“saffron hooliganism”) in Anandabazar Patrika’s coverage of alleged violence at Jadavpur University. The journalists have approached the High Court seeking relief in connection with the criminal proceedings.

The post Calcutta High Court secures no-coercive-action assurance for Anandabazar Patrika journalists in ‘saffron hooliganism’ FIRs appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Nandigram By-Poll: Supreme Court declines to intervene in Congress candidate Milan pradhan’s interim bail
  • Delhi High Court Justice Prateek Jalan recuses from hearing Delhi Gymkhana Club eviction plea
  • Delhi High Court asks authorities to decide within six months on SOP for police body-worn cameras
  • Supreme Court: High Court should not suggest custodial interrogation is necessary while deciding anticipatory bail
  • Delhi High Court seeks clarity on legal framework for structural audits after Satya Niketan building collapse

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.