LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Sikkim High Court: Turning 18 doesn’t permit settlement of POCSO case

07/09/2026BlogNo Comments

The Sikkim High Court has held that criminal proceedings under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act cannot be quashed merely because the survivor has attained majority and subsequently settled the matter with the accused.

 The Bench of Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan made the observation while dismissing a petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings arising from an alleged sexual offence committed when the survivor was 17 years old. The accused was around 19 at the time of the alleged incident.

The case arose from an FIR registered at Sadar Police Station, Gangtok, concerning an alleged sexual offence committed on November 26, 2022. The accused was facing charges under the POCSO Act and Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

During the pendency of the trial, the families of the accused and the survivor entered into a compromise. By then, the survivor had attained majority. The accused, survivor and their respective parents subsequently approached the High Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), seeking quashing of the FIR and criminal proceedings.

The High Court, however, held that the subsequent settlement could not override the statutory framework of the POCSO Act, under which a person below 18 years is a child and cannot give legally valid consent to sexual activity.

The Court relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Re: Right to Privacy of Adolescents, which had clarified that even where an accused and a survivor who has subsequently attained majority enter into a settlement, prosecution for offences under POCSO cannot be quashed on that basis.

The Court also acknowledged the potentially severe consequences for the accused but held that such considerations could not override binding Supreme Court precedent.

Accordingly, the High Court rejected the petition and directed that its order be sent to the Special POCSO Court at Gangtok. It left it open to the parties to approach the Supreme Court for appropriate relief.

The post Sikkim High Court: Turning 18 doesn’t permit settlement of POCSO case appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Nandigram By-Poll: Supreme Court declines to intervene in Congress candidate Milan pradhan’s interim bail
  • Delhi High Court Justice Prateek Jalan recuses from hearing Delhi Gymkhana Club eviction plea
  • Delhi High Court asks authorities to decide within six months on SOP for police body-worn cameras
  • Supreme Court: High Court should not suggest custodial interrogation is necessary while deciding anticipatory bail
  • Delhi High Court seeks clarity on legal framework for structural audits after Satya Niketan building collapse

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.