LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi Court rejects anticipatory bail plea of YouTuber Ajeet Bharti in SC/ST Act case

07/09/2026BlogNo Comments

A Delhi court on Monday rejected the anticipatory bail plea filed by YouTuber and commentator Ajeet Bharti in a case registered against him under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (SC/ST Act).

Additional Sessions Judge Saurabh Pratap Singh Laler of  Patiala House Court passed the order. Bharti is facing an FIR registered at North Avenue Police Station on August 23 under provisions of the SC/ST Act, Section 67 of the Information Technology Act and Sections 196(1)(c) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

The case arose from a complaint filed by Balakram Bauddh, Delhi State President of the Azad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram), concerning a video titled “SB79: Reservation Hatao Andolan Nautanki & More | Saptahik Bakaiti” published on Bharti’s social media handle.

According to the complaint, Bharti allegedly used caste-based and abusive language, made objectionable remarks concerning Azad Samaj Party leader Chandrashekhar Azad, popularly known as ‘Ravan’, and Dr BR Ambedkar, used sexually derogatory language against women and issued threats.

Opposing the allegations, Bharti’s counsel, Advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai, submitted that the remarks were made in response to what he described as a “grave provocation” by a person who allegedly commented that Bharti’s married sister should marry Chandrashekhar Azad.

The counsel argued that Bharti had not abused any caste or community and that his remarks were directed only at the individual who allegedly made the comment about his sister.

Dehadrai also denied that Bharti had made derogatory remarks against Ambedkar, submitting that his references to him were made “with the deepest respect”.

He further relied on several judicial precedents to argue that the ingredients of an offence under the SC/ST Act were not made out.

The Delhi Police, meanwhile, submitted that Bharti need not apprehend arrest merely because an FIR had been registered against him.

The court, however, rejected the anticipatory bail plea. The detailed reasons for the decision will be clear once the order is released.

The post Delhi Court rejects anticipatory bail plea of YouTuber Ajeet Bharti in SC/ST Act case appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi court sends Swatantra Bhardwaj to 14 days judicial custody in CJP protest assault case
  • Supreme Court pulls up Maharashtra over repeated assaults on doctors
  • Delhi High Court hears fresh inquiry into 2013 sexual harassment complaint against IIT Delhi professor
  • Technology alone cannot end stock witness practice: Justice Vivek Agarwal at Supreme Court panel consultation
  • Delhi Court rejects anticipatory bail plea of YouTuber Ajeet Bharti in SC/ST Act case

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.