LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Asian Games:  Delhi High Court says, courts cannot override expert decision to exclude athlete

22/09/2026BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court has held that courts cannot interfere with a decision to exclude an athlete from a particular category at the Asian Games when the decision has been objectively taken by the concerned authorities and subject experts.

Justice Amit Mahajan made the observation while dismissing a petition filed by athlete Muskan Rathi challenging the decision of the Indian Kurash Association (TIKA) not to conduct selection trials for the women’s +87 kg category for the 20th Asian Games.

Rathi had sought directions for conducting fair and transparent selection trials in the category, contending that all eligible athletes should be considered on the basis of comparative merit, objective performance criteria and medal-winning potential.

The authorities, however, told the Court that selection trials were conducted for the women’s -57 kg and -78 kg categories, where India had previously secured medals. No international medal had been secured in the +87 kg category in the preceding two years, they submitted.

The Court noted that the authorities had assessed the comparative medal-winning potential of different categories and the likelihood of winning medals before deciding not to send an athlete in the +87 kg category.

Justice Mahajan observed that the decision was based on an objective assessment by the authorities and subject experts and therefore could not be substituted by the Court’s own view.

The Court further held that while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, it could not issue a writ of mandamus directing authorities to take a different decision.

The Court also rejected Rathi’s contention concerning the non-participation of candidates selected in the -57 kg category despite their names having been forwarded.

Notably, the 2026 Asian Games commenced on September 19, and the Court observed that no effective relief could be granted to the petitioner at this stage.

The petition was accordingly dismissed.

The post Asian Games:  Delhi High Court says, courts cannot override expert decision to exclude athlete appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • CEC Act: Judges split over reference to Constitution Bench; Justice Datta junks ‘judges appointing judges’ theory, calls for permanent Constitutional Bench
  • Three months a red flag: Supreme Court flags delay in TMC MPs’ disqualification pleas before Lok Sabha Speaker
  • Delhi Court seeks police response on plea for FIR against Nishu Azad, father over social media posts
  • Maharashtra Magistrate issues contempt warning to Railway official over bedbug-infested VIP room
  • Supreme Court takes suo motu cognizance of Patna High Court ruling holding removal of salwar, pressing chest insufficient for attempt to rape

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.