LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Allahabad High Court rejects Samajwadi Party MP Barq’s plea to quash fIR

04/01/2025BlogNo Comments

The Allahabad High Court has rejected the application filed seeking quashing of the FIR registered against Samajwadi Party MP Zia-ur-Rahman Barq.

The Division Bench of Justice Rajiv Gupta and Justice Mohd Azhar Husain Idrisi passed this order while hearing a petition filed by Zia-Ur-Rehman Barq.

Although, the prayer made in the writ petition is to quash the FIR arising out of Case under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 221, 132, 125, 324(5), 196, 223(b), 326(f) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3 & 5 of the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984, Police Station Sambhal, District Sambhal, but when the matter has been taken up, counsel for the petitioner has submitted that all the offences, complained of, are punishable up to seven years and therefore, before effecting the arrest of the petitioner, specific provisions contained in Section 35 of BNSS be strictly complied with in view of law laid down by the Apex Court in several judgments.

The Court perused the FIR, which prima facie discloses the cognizable offence against the petitioner and therefore, the prayer made to quash the FIR cannot be entertained in view of law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani reported in (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Vs State of Maharashtra and Others reported in (2021) SCC Online SC 315 and as such, the Court is of the view that no interference is warranted.

The Court observed that the fact that all the offences, complained of in the impugned FIR, are punishable with a term up to 7 years, therefore, in case of effecting the arrest of the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned FIR, the Court directed that the respondents/authorities shall ensure that the specific provisions contained in Section 35 of BNSS and the guidelines issued by the  Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 as well as the directions issued in the order dated 28.01.2021.

With the aforesaid observations, the Court disposed of the petition.

The post Allahabad High Court rejects Samajwadi Party MP Barq’s plea to quash fIR appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • The Politics of Rape
  • The Court of Trump: How the Supreme Court Is Becoming a Weapon of Authoritarian Rule
  • “I wasn’t informed of any charges until the very last day of my illegal detention”
  • Supreme Court to hear pleas challenging revision of Bihar electoral rolls on July 10
  • From Lucknow To Low Earth Orbit: Shukla’s Giant Leap For India

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.