LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Amit Shah derogatory remarks case: Supreme Court stays criminal defamation proceedings against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi

20/01/2025BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court on Monday stayed criminal defamation proceedings against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who was booked for allegedly making derogatory remarks against Union Home Minister Amit Shah during a speech in March 2018

The Bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta issued notice to the Jharkhand government and the complainant on the petition filed by Gandhi seeking quashing of the case.

Representing Gandhi, Senior Counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi pointed out that the complaint was filed by a third party, which was not permissible regarding the offence of defamation.

He argued that if a person was not aggrieved, he could not file a proxy complaint.

The matter pertained to a complaint filed by BJP leader Navin Jha against Gandhi, alleging that the Congress leader delivered a speech on March 18, 2018, criticising the BJP and accusing Shah of being involved in a murder.

A Magistrate court in Ranchi had initially dismissed Jha’s complaint, prompting him to file a revision petition before the Judicial Commissioner in Ranchi.

On September 15, 2018, the judicial commissioner in Ranchi overturned the order that dismissed the complaint petition and sent it back to the magistrate court.

The judicial commissioner directed the magistrate to review the evidence on record again and issue a fresh order regarding the determination of prima facie material to proceed with the matter.

The Magistrate passed a fresh order on November 28, 2018, concluding that there was sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against Gandhi under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (punishment for defamation). Summons were also issued by the Magistrate seeking Gandhi’s appearance before the trial court.

The Congress leader moved the High Court challenging the Ranchi judicial commissioner’s order of September 15, 2018.

The single-judge Bench of Justice Ambuj Nath noted that Gandhi had said that BJP leaders were liars, who were drunk with power and that BJP workers would accept a person accused of murder as their president.

The High Court dismissed Gandhi’s petition on the grounds that the statements made by him were prima facie defamatory in nature under Section 499 IPC.

On the face of it, the statement suggested that Gandhi implied that the leadership of BJP was intoxicated with power and consisted of deceitful individuals. It further meant that BJP party workers would accept such a person as their leader. This imputation was prima facie defamatory in nature, it added.

The High Court also referred to Explanation 2 to Section 499 of IPC as per which imputations against a company, association or collection of persons would fall within the scope of defamation.

The post Amit Shah derogatory remarks case: Supreme Court stays criminal defamation proceedings against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • The Politics of Rape
  • The Court of Trump: How the Supreme Court Is Becoming a Weapon of Authoritarian Rule
  • “I wasn’t informed of any charges until the very last day of my illegal detention”
  • Supreme Court to hear pleas challenging revision of Bihar electoral rolls on July 10
  • From Lucknow To Low Earth Orbit: Shukla’s Giant Leap For India

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.