LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

BTC appointment bribe case: Bengaluru court accepts Lokayukta closure report giving clean chit to Siddaramaiah

27/01/2025BlogNo Comments

A special court in Bengaluru has accepted the closure report filed by the state Lokayukta Police on September 12, 2024, giving clean chit to former Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah in a Rs 1.3 crore bribe case regarding appointments in the Bangalore Turf Club (BTC).

Additional City Civil and Sessions judge Santosh Gajanan Bhat accepted the closure report on January 24, on the grounds that the complainant (BJP leader NR Ramesh) failed to establish sufficient grounds to support the allegations.

The court said that the Lokayukta Police, after completing its preliminary inquiry in the case, had filed a closure report submitting that there was no act of quid pro quo as alleged by the complainant.

Ramesh had alleged that in 2015, Siddaramaiah, as Chief Minister of Karnataka, had accepted an illegal gratification of Rs 1.3 crore from one L Vivekananda to get him appointed as a steward and committee member of BTC.

Refuting the allegations, Siddaramaiah claimed that he had taken that money as a loan amount and even declared the same in his 2023 election affidavit.

Taking into account the submissions made by Siddaramaiah, the special court observed that there was nothing on record to prove that Rs 1.3 crore had been received by Siddaramaiah as an illegal gratification.

It further said that mere acceptance or receipt of an illegal gratification without anything more would not make it an offence under Section 7 or Section 13(1)(d), (i) and (ii), respectively, of the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act.

In order to bring home the offence under Section 7 of the Act, there must be an offer emanating from the bribe giver, which was accepted by the public servant.

The post BTC appointment bribe case: Bengaluru court accepts Lokayukta closure report giving clean chit to Siddaramaiah appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • The Politics of Rape
  • The Court of Trump: How the Supreme Court Is Becoming a Weapon of Authoritarian Rule
  • “I wasn’t informed of any charges until the very last day of my illegal detention”
  • Supreme Court to hear pleas challenging revision of Bihar electoral rolls on July 10
  • From Lucknow To Low Earth Orbit: Shukla’s Giant Leap For India

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.