LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi High Court orders blocking of websites illegally streaming Stranger Things, Squid Game

03/01/2026BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court has directed the blocking of multiple rogue websites found to be unlawfully hosting and disseminating pirated cinematographic films and television programmes, including Stranger Things, Friends, Batman, Squid Game and The Jungle Book, among others.

The single-judge Bench of Justice Tejas Karia granted comprehensive injunctive relief in favour of global content owners—Warner Bros., Netflix, Apple, Disney and Crunchyroll—restraining the continued infringement of their copyrighted works and extending protection to future works upon their creation. It permitted the plaintiffs to implead mirror, redirect, alphanumeric and variant websites that replicate or facilitate access to the infringing platforms, without requiring separate proceedings.

Recognising the evolving and evasive architecture of online piracy, the High Court underscored the ‘hydra-headed’ nature of such infringing domains and found it necessary to adopt a proactive and technologically responsive approach. It held that immediate protection of copyrighted works is imperative to prevent irreparable harm, given the high likelihood of newly released content being uploaded on infringing platforms or their successor websites almost instantaneously.

The plaintiffs, members of the Motion Picture Association, submitted that they are global entertainment corporations holding exclusive copyright under Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957, in an extensive catalogue of cinematographic films and audio-visual works. They contended that the defendant websites were flagrantly violating Sections 51 and 55 of the Act by enabling real-time streaming and downloads of protected content without authorisation, notwithstanding repeated takedown notices.

After perusing the material on record, the High Court observed that the plaintiffs had made out a strong prima facie case of copyright infringement and that the balance of convenience lay squarely in their favour. It noted that such unauthorised exploitation resulted in substantial commercial and reputational loss, undermined the legitimate digital distribution ecosystem, and warranted urgent judicial intervention.

The single-judge Bench placed reliance on established jurisprudence, including UTV Software Communication Ltd. v. 1337x.to, Disney Enterprises Inc. v. Kimcartoon.to, and Star India Pvt. Ltd. v. Moviestrunk.com, the Court reaffirmed that dynamic injunctions are an effective remedy to curb online piracy in the digital age.

Consequently, it directed domain name registrars to suspend and lock the identified infringing domains within 72 hours and furnish Basic Subscriber Information (BSI) details in a sealed cover. Internet service providers were instructed to block access to the infringing websites within the same timeframe, ensuring effective enforcement of the injunction.

The post Delhi High Court orders blocking of websites illegally streaming Stranger Things, Squid Game appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • West Bengal voter roll revision: EC sets up 19 Tribunals for appeals under Supreme Court oversight
  • Newshounds on social media watch out! Govt proposes amendments to IT Rules that may impact them
  • West Bengal elections: Calcutta HC dismisses PIL challenging ECI transfer of bureaucrats, police officers
  • Vedanta approaches Supreme Court over Adani’s Jaiprakash Associates resolution plan
  • Andhra Pradesh High Court clarifies Property Rights in absence of children under Hindu Succession Act

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.