LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi High Court recognises right of spouse to sue partner’s lover for alienation of affection

22/09/2025BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court has ruled that a spouse is entitled to institute a civil action for damages against their partner’s lover for unlawfully intruding upon the sanctity of marriage, thereby causing what is known in legal parlance as “alienation of affection.” In Shelly Mahajan v. Bhanushree Bahl & Anr., Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav observed that such a tortious claim is legally tenable, provided the aggrieved party is able to properly set out and prove the essential elements of the wrong.

For a claim of this nature to succeed, it must be demonstrated that the defendant intentionally and unjustifiably interfered with the marital relationship in a manner designed to estrange the affection of one spouse from the other, that this intrusion resulted in a cognisable injury such as the loss of companionship, intimacy, or consortium, and that the damages sought are reasonably ascertainable.

Although Indian statutory law does not specifically codify alienation of affection as a tort, the Court underscored that judicial recognition of the concept exists. However, it also acknowledged that Indian courts have not yet evolved a comprehensive framework for awarding damages exclusively on this ground, nor have they articulated detailed procedural standards to guide such actions.

The judgment further clarified that these claims fall within the jurisdiction of Civil Courts and are not rendered untenable merely because matrimonial proceedings are simultaneously pending. While certain facts may overlap, a civil action for wrongful interference stands on a distinct footing from remedies available under matrimonial law.

The Court has distinguished civil liability from criminal culpability. While referring to the Supreme Court’s decision in Joseph Shine, which decriminalised adultery, the Bench emphasised that the absence of criminality does not shield such conduct from civil consequences. Decriminalisation, the Court noted, cannot be interpreted as a licence for third parties to disrupt a marriage with impunity.

The post Delhi High Court recognises right of spouse to sue partner’s lover for alienation of affection appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion
  • Between Tariffs and Trust: India’s High-Stakes Trade Reset with America
  • Judicial leadership falters when judges project perfection: CJI Surya Kant
  • Supreme Court seeks CBI status report on Manipur violence cases, considers shifting trial monitoring to High Courts

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.