LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Gauhati High Court grants time to petitioner to file reply in PIL on misuse of allotted funds

14/02/2025BlogNo Comments

The Gauhati High Court has recently granted two weeks’ time to the petitioner’s counsel to file a reply to the counter-affidavit filed by the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council in a public interest litigation (PIL) against misutilization of funds.

Podmo Taron, a resident of Karbi Anglong, Assam, had filed the PIL against the Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region (DONER) and 11 other respondents, including the Council.

The petitioner’s primary grievance was that DONER had sanctioned a grant of Rs 515.27 lakh to the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council for the construction of the Diphu Sports Complex. However, despite the allocation of funds, the Council failed to utilize the amount for the intended purpose. 

Instead, the funds were allegedly used for other purposes not sanctioned by the DONER.

The petitioner contended that the Diphu Sports Complex was to include various facilities such as a sports hostel, hockey field, swimming pool, indoor sports hall, spectators’ gallery, and artificial rock climbing wall. However, due to the misutilization of funds, the project has been halted.

In response to the PIL, the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council filed a counter affidavit stating the funds received from the DONER had been utilized. 

However, the Council added that the entire sanctioned amount had not been disbursed, resulting in the halting of the project.

The bench of Chief Justice Vijay Bishnoi and Justice Suman Shyam granted time to the petitioner’s counsel, B Baruah, to file a reply affidavit, and listed it for further hearing after two weeks.

The post Gauhati High Court grants time to petitioner to file reply in PIL on misuse of allotted funds appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • The Politics of Rape
  • The Court of Trump: How the Supreme Court Is Becoming a Weapon of Authoritarian Rule
  • “I wasn’t informed of any charges until the very last day of my illegal detention”
  • Supreme Court to hear pleas challenging revision of Bihar electoral rolls on July 10
  • From Lucknow To Low Earth Orbit: Shukla’s Giant Leap For India

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.