LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Lok Sabha Elections 2024: JKP leader moves Allahabad High Court against rejection of nomination form as Varanasi candidate by RO

12/09/2024BlogNo Comments

A petition has been filed in the Allahabad High Court by a Janhit Kisan Party (JKP) leader who intended to contest the Lok Sabha elections 2024 from Varanasi against Prime Minister Narendra Modi against the Returning Officer rejecting his nomination form.

Filed by JKP leader Vijay Nandan, a native of Madhya Pradesh’s Seoni district, the petition claimed that the District Election Officer wrongly rejected his nomination papers on the ground that the affidavit column was left blank and that no fresh affidavit was filed nor administered oath/affirmation.

As per the petitioner, all the documents on the checklist were properly received by the Assistant Returning Officer concerned as per the rules of the Election Commission of India. The Returning Officer and the Assistant Returning Officer were responsible for administering the oath/affirmation to the candidate.

After taking the oath/affirmation, the receipt seal was to be signed and given to the candidate; however, the same was not done, and his nomination paper was arbitrarily rejected, alleged the petitioner.

He said a careful and exhaustive reading of the impugned nomination form rejection order of the Returning Officer dated May 15, 2024, revealed a clerical mistake that could have been rectified at the time of scrutiny. However, the Returning Officer committed illegality by not doing so.

Had the Returning Officer acted legally and in consonance with law, he would have accepted the nomination forms submitted by the petitioner and allowed him to contest the election. By depriving the petitioner of his valuable right to contest the poll, respondent no. 4 acted contrary to law and his decision deserved to be interfered by the High Court, noted the plea.

The petition further contended that the nomination form of any candidate could be rejected only if there was any concealment of fact in giving a declaration, but in the present case, in the entire impugned order, nowhere was it mentioned that the petitioner concealed any information while submitting the candidature.

If the affidavit column was left blank, it was the duty of the Returning Officer to rectify the mistake. However, in the present case, instead of redressing the clerical error, the Returning Officer, in gross violation of natural justice, rejected the petitioner’s candidature, it alleged.

The petitioner further stated that the Assistant Returning Officer did not follow the rules of the Election Commission and therefore, was eligible for criminal punishment as per the rules of the Election Commission.

The plea submitted that 140 crore citizens of India had confidence in the Election Commission and cast their votes in the Lok Sabha elections to elect the Prime Minister and the Chief Minister of various states of the country so that they could develop the nation. A District Election Officer played an important role in this process.

However, the Varanasi District Election Officer violated all the rules to benefit a particular person by breaking the trust of 140 crore citizens of the country.

The post Lok Sabha Elections 2024: JKP leader moves Allahabad High Court against rejection of nomination form as Varanasi candidate by RO appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Bombay High Court upholds DCPR Regulation providing rehabilitation for slum dwellers on encroached lands
  • ED withdraws summons issued to Senior Advocate Pratap Venugopal following SCAORA letter to CJI BR Gavai
  • Supreme Court closes PIL seeking release of Tamil feature film Thug Life in Karnataka
  • Justice Varma probe committee report out, finds sufficient substance for impeachment
  • CJI BR Gavai highlights role of Constitution in advancing socio-economic justice for Indians

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.
Need Help? Chat with us
Start a Conversation
Hi! Click one of our member below to chat on WhatsApp
The team typically replies in a few minutes.
Whatsapp
Lets Chat
Powered by NinjaTeam