LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Madras High Court grants Interim protection to Ilaiyaraaja’s personality and publicity rights

21/11/2025BlogNo Comments

The Madras High Court has accorded interim judicial protection to renowned music composer Ilaiyaraaja, recognising a prima facie infringement of his personality rights. Justice N Senthilkumar, while issuing an interim injunction, observed that the composer’s identity attributes were being used across digital platforms without his authorisation, thereby amounting to a wrongful commercial appropriation of his persona.

The Court noted that various online entities had engaged in the unauthorised utilisation of Ilaiyaraaja’s name, image, likeness, voice samples, caricatures, animated representations, and artificial intelligence generated visuals. Such acts, the Court held, possess the potential to mislead the public into believing that the composer had endorsed or collaborated with these channels, when no such consent existed.

Senior Advocate S Prabhakaran, appearing for Ilaiyaraaja, submitted that multiple YouTube channels and social media accounts had been circulating morphed videos, memes, and deepfake style content, synchronising the composer’s music with digitally fabricated visuals. This, counsel argued, constituted an illegitimate commercial exploitation of Ilaiyaraaja’s personality and reputational goodwill.

The Court relied on established jurisprudence that affirms the enforceability of personality and publicity rights. It referred to prior judicial pronouncements, including the decision on impersonation through artificial intelligence and the earlier ruling in Shivaji Rao Gaekwad v Varsha Productions, where it was held that the law protects not only the natural likeness of a person but also stylised or animated depictions that evoke their identity.

In light of the submissions and the materials placed on record, the Court concluded that the plaintiff had established a strong prima facie case and that the balance of convenience lay decisively in his favour. Accordingly, an interim injunction was granted restraining the defendants from employing any attribute that directly or indirectly identifies Ilaiyaraaja without securing prior written consent.

The post Madras High Court grants Interim protection to Ilaiyaraaja’s personality and publicity rights appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion
  • Between Tariffs and Trust: India’s High-Stakes Trade Reset with America
  • Judicial leadership falters when judges project perfection: CJI Surya Kant
  • Supreme Court seeks CBI status report on Manipur violence cases, considers shifting trial monitoring to High Courts

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.