LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Madras High Court Judge Justice GR Swaminathan defends Guru tradition during private event

24/02/2026BlogNo Comments

Justice GR Swaminathan of the Madras High Court courted controversy yet again, when he said that the rationalists, who called people fools, incompetent and barbarians for treating spiritual gurus as equilvalent to God, were the real fools, incompetent and barbarians.

Speaking in Tamil during the ‘Guru Vandanam Utsavam’ organised by the Hosur Satsangh at a private educational institution in Hosur recently, the judge noted that while the divine may be conceived as an abstract metaphysical principle, the Guru represented a living embodiment of that principle in tangible form. He asserted that Gurus possessed a powerful positive aura capable of dispelling negativity in those who came in close proximity with them.

The judge also recounted a personal episode involving a late-night journey undertaken with his spouse after attending his daughter’s convocation ceremony in Punjab. He claimed that he encountered hazardous driving conditions due to dense fog, followed by a sudden tyre puncture, leaving him in a momentary state of helplessness. He stated that invoking his spiritual guide during that episode provided him with composure and inner strength, reinforcing his faith in the Guru’s protective grace.

Although the speech was delivered in a personal capacity at a private function, it has sparked debate on the permissible ambit of extra-judicial speech by members of the higher judiciary.

While judges enjoy the freedoms guaranteed under Articles 19(1)(a) and 25 of the Constitution, those liberties operate within the broader framework of judicial ethics and institutional neutrality.

Justice Swaminathan had previously made public statements referencing Sanatana Dharma and the role of spiritual tradition in public life, which have also generated discussion. The present remarks have added to the ongoing debate concerning the balance between individual belief and the institutional expectation of restraint.

The post Madras High Court Judge Justice GR Swaminathan defends Guru tradition during private event appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Trump’s Capitol Spectacle: Showmanship, Scorn  And A Nation Divided
  • The Reality Of Artificial Intelligence
  • Summit Storm: Shirtless Protests, A Robot Dog, and Questions Around Rahul Gandhi
  • Plea in Supreme Court challenges constitutionality of SHANTI Act on Nuclear liability
  • Supreme Court stays Delhi High Court order for raising Coast guard retirement age to 60; directs Centre to set up expert panel

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.