LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

PIL filed in Supreme Court against multiple trademark applications for Operation Sindoor

10/05/2025BlogNo Comments

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court against the filing of multiple trademark applications for the term ‘Operation Sindoor,’ the name of India’s ongoing military operation against Pakistan.

Soon after the Government of India made the name of the operation public, 12 entities or persons, including Reliance, moved the Trademark Registry seeking exclusive rights under Class 41, which covers education, entertainment, cultural and media services.

This led to public outrage, with Reliance eventually withdrawing its application.

Filed by Advocate Dev Ashish Dubey, a
practicing lawyer based out of Delhi, the petition alleged that such attempts to seek the trademark registration for the military operation name sought to exploit public sentiment and the nation’s grief for commercial gain.

The plea further submitted that ‘Operation Sindoor,’ which was initially undertaken to avenge the killings of tourists in Pahalgam, held deep emotional value, especially for the families of martyred soldiers.

The name symbolised the sacrifice of widows, metaphorically linked with ‘sindoor,’ a traditional mark of marriage in India.

Moved by Advocate Om Prakash Parihar, the petition contended that such attempts to seek trademark registration of the name was not only insensitive but also in direct violation of Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which prohibited registration of terms likely to hurt public sentiment or that lack distinctiveness in a commercial context.

The petitioner requested the top court of the country to restrain the authorities from proceeding with such trademark registration so as to prevent the commercialization of a name associated with national sacrifice and military valor.

The plea contended that the matter raised significant questions around ethical boundaries in intellectual property law, particularly when national security and public emotion intersect.

The post PIL filed in Supreme Court against multiple trademark applications for Operation Sindoor appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • India-Canada: Critical Partners Must Reset Diplomatic Ties
  • Lawless Ambitions, Judicial Setbacks, And A Billionaire Rebellion
  • The Politics of Sindoor
  • CJI BR Gavai terms arbitration as strong pillar showcasing transformation of justice delivery system
  • “One Rank, One Pension”: SC Ends Discrimination in Judges’ Benefits

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.