LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Suicide abetment case: Uttarakhand High Court stays conviction of vaccine scientist in national interest

05/08/2025BlogNo Comments

The Uttarakhand High Court has stayed the conviction of a vaccine scientist in a suicide abetment case on the grounds that if he was not allowed to resume his research work, it may affect the interest of the nation. 

The single-judge Bench of Justice Ravindra Maithani observed that the scientist’s research work of vaccine development was a matter of public health and national interest.

The High Court passed the interim order on a petition filed by Akash Yadav, a scientist with PhD from IIT Kharagpur and Senior Manager at the Indian Immunologicals Limited.

He was accused of dowry harassment and abetting the suicide of his wife. The prosecution claimed that the wife had left behind a suicide note blaming the scientist for her death.

While clearing Yadav of offences concerning dowry death, the trial court convicted him under Section 306 (abetment to suicide) of the Indian Penal Code.

Yadav moved the High Court challenging his conviction. He further requested the High Court to stay his conviction and sentence until the appeal was decided.

The scientist was released from jail on bail on April 7. 

Appearing for Yadav, Advocate Harshit Sanwal apprised the High Court that the scientist’s conviction was hampering his critical role in vaccine research, which was vital to public health and national interest. No case was made out against Yadav as he had been acquitted under Sections 304-B (dowry death) IPC and Sections 3 and 4 (punishment for dowry death) of the Dowry Prohibition Act, he added. 

Representing the State of Uttarakhand, Additional Government Advocate VS Rawat opposed the plea by pointing to the wife’s suicide note blaming Yadav.

The High Court suspended Yadav’s conviction and sentence till his appeal was decided.

Relying on Supreme Court verdicts, including Rama Narang v Ramesh Narang and Navjot Singh Sidhu v State of Punjab, the High Court observed that in exceptional cases, an appellate court may suspend a conviction if its consequences caused irreparable harm.

The post Suicide abetment case: Uttarakhand High Court stays conviction of vaccine scientist in national interest appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Trump, and the “Birthday Book”: The Haunting Return of a Predator’s Legacy
  • A Resounding Rebuke
  • When POCSO Hides Within Confusion
  • India’s Tightrope in a Volatile World
  • Regaining Lost Ground?

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.