LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court reprimands J&K government for not regularising services of daily wage workers despite High Court order in 2007

10/03/2025BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court has expressed its strong displeasure against the Jammu and Kashmir government for not complying with a High Court order passed in 2007, directing to regularise the services of certain daily wage workers.

The Bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice N Kotiswar Singh observed that the case was a glaring and textbook example of obstination exhibited by the state authorities, considering themselves to be above and beyond the reach of law.

Dismissing an appeal filed by the Union Territory administration, the Apex Court said the inaction of J&K officers, who took about 16 years to comply with a simpliciter High Court order passed on May 3, 2007, was shocking and prima facie contemptuous.

The daily wage workers had moved the High Court in 2006 seeking regularisation of their service and payment of wages in terms of SRO 64 of 1994 as they had been working for 14 to 19 years. A single-judge Bench of the High Court passed an order in 2007, directing the Union Territory administration to regularise their services.

The J&K administration challenged the order in the Apex Court.

The top court of the country noted that it was an incontrovertible fact that the respondents, being daily wage workers, were being repeatedly harassed by the petitioners by passing cryptic orders, thereby overlooking the true import and spirit of the order dated May 3, 2007 passed by the single-judge Bench of the High Court.

The Bench initially decided to impose exemplary costs on the officers responsible but later refrained from doing so in view of the fact that contempt of court proceedings were already ongoing before the High Court.

The top court of the country directed the single-judge Bench of the High Court to take up the contempt proceedings on a weekly basis and ensure that the majesty and sanctity of law was wellimaintained in the case.

The post Supreme Court reprimands J&K government for not regularising services of daily wage workers despite High Court order in 2007 appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court: Insolvency proceedings in real estate should primarily be project-specific
  • Delhi High Court upholds BSF court’s power to try POCSO cases
  • Supreme Court to deliver interim order on Waqf Act amendments amidst constitutional challenge
  • WhatsApp messages not immune to law: Dwarka court grants damages in defamation case
  • Time For Reckoning

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.