LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court stays Lokpal order allowing complaints against High Court judges under Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act

20/02/2025BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed a recent Lokpal order allowing complaints against High Court judges under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.

The Bench of Justice BR Gavai, Justice Surya Kant and Justice Abhay S Oka passed the order on a suo motu case initiated by the Court following the January 27 order passed by the Lokpal.

Termed the order as something ‘very very disturbing,’ the Apex Court issued notice to the central government and the Registrar of Lokpal.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, said that High Court judges would never fall within the ambit of the 2013 Act. Each judge was the High Court, he added.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal also offered to assist the Court on the issue. Terming the ruling as exceptionally disturbing, Sibal said it was fraught with danger. He further sought a stay on the order.

The order was passed by the the Lokpal’s Full Bench headed by Justice AM Khanwilkar, while dealing with two complaints against a High Court judge alleging him of influencing an Additional District Judge and another High Court judge in a suit.

Without going into the merits of the allegations, it ruled that the Judges of the High Court, established by an Act of Parliament, came within the ambit of Section 14 of the 2013 Act. A High Court judge met the definition of a ‘public servant’. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 does not exclude judges, it added.

The Lokpal, however, decided to first approach the Chief Justice of India (CJI) for guidance on the issue. It deferred further action on the complaints till four weeks, keeping in mind the statutory time frame to dispose of the complaint in terms of Section 20 (4) of the 2013 Act.

The complaints were also forwarded to the CJI by Lokpal.

The Lokpal redacted the name of the judge and the High Court before making its decision public.

The Apex Court today injuncted the person, who filed complaints against the High Court judge before the Lokpal, from disclosing the judge’s name and the contents of the complaint.

It then listed the matter for further hearing on March 21.

The post Supreme Court stays Lokpal order allowing complaints against High Court judges under Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • The Politics of Rape
  • The Court of Trump: How the Supreme Court Is Becoming a Weapon of Authoritarian Rule
  • “I wasn’t informed of any charges until the very last day of my illegal detention”
  • Supreme Court to hear pleas challenging revision of Bihar electoral rolls on July 10
  • From Lucknow To Low Earth Orbit: Shukla’s Giant Leap For India

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.