LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court stays NCPCR directive on withdrawal of recognition for Madrassas not complying with RTE Act

22/10/2024BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court has directed the Union Government and the States not to act till further orders on the communications issued by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), directing to withdraw the recognition of Madrassas not compliant with the Right to Education Act 2009.

The Bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrahcud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra on Monday issued notice on a writ petition filed by the Islamic clerics’ body Jamiat Ulema-I-Hind challenging the NCPCR’s action.

On June 7, 2024, the NCPCR wrote to the Chief Secretary of the State of Uttar Pradesh directing that the recognition of Madrassas not complying with the RTE Act be withdrawn.

After more than two weeks, the Commission wrote to the Secretary, Department of Education & Literacy, Ministry of Education, Government of India on June 25, seeking directions to all States/UTs to conduct inspections of the existing Madrasas with the UDISE Code.

The Commission requested that the recognition and the UDISE Code of the Madrassas not complying with the norms under the RTE Act, 2009, should be withdrawn with immediate effect.

It also requested the Union government not to extend the UDISE system to Madrasas. Instead, a separate category of UDIE may be created to capture information about all Madrassas, including the recognised, unrecognised and unmapped ones, it added.

On June 26, 2024, the Uttar Pradesh Chief Secretary wrote to all District Collectors to conduct a ‘detailed investigation’ of all government-aided/recognised madrassas in the state that admitted non-Muslim children, and to ensure ‘immediate’ admission of all children enrolled in Madrassas into schools.

A similar instruction was issued by the Government of Tripura on August 28, 2024.

On July 10, 2024, the Union Government wrote to all States/UTs to follow the NCPCR’s directives.

Jamiat Ulema-I-Hind moved the Apex Court against these directives, alleging an infringement of the right of religious minorities to impart education as per Article 30 of the Constitution.

Passing an interim order, the Apex Court directed that pending further orders, the communications issued by the NCPCR on June 7 and June 25, 2024, on June 26 by the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh, on July 10 by the Secretary, Department of Education & Literacy, Ministry of Education, Government of India, and the communication dated August 28, 2024 issued by the Government of Tripura, shall not be acted upon.

Further allowing an oral request made by Jaising, the Bench granted liberty to the petitioner to implead all States/UTs in the plea, which was filed through AoR Fuzail Ahmed Ayyubi.

The post Supreme Court stays NCPCR directive on withdrawal of recognition for Madrassas not complying with RTE Act appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion
  • Between Tariffs and Trust: India’s High-Stakes Trade Reset with America
  • Judicial leadership falters when judges project perfection: CJI Surya Kant
  • Supreme Court seeks CBI status report on Manipur violence cases, considers shifting trial monitoring to High Courts

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.