LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court streamlines homebuyer disputes, grants builder bail and combines 81 FIRs

20/08/2025BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court has granted six months’ interim bail to a builder facing a multitude of criminal cases, while simultaneously ordering the consolidation of 81 separate FIRs into one comprehensive case. The Court noted that the decision was essential to prevent duplication of proceedings and to safeguard the interests of home buyers caught in prolonged disputes.

The order was passed by a Bench comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, who observed that the criminal complaints all stemmed from the same chain of transactions and therefore ought to be dealt with collectively. The earliest FIR, registered on January 11, 2018, at Shastri Nagar Police Station in Patna, has been designated as the principal case. All other FIRs, past and future, will now be recorded as statements under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ensuring a streamlined process that avoids repetitive trials.

The Court emphasised that while interim relief has been granted, it comes with stringent safeguards. The builder must deposit ₹9.94 crore with the Court registry within the stipulated period. This amount, the judges clarified, is a partial deposit and not a full and final settlement of liabilities. In addition, he must furnish a security bond of ₹5 lakh with a solvent surety of equivalent value.

Further restrictions include the surrender of his passport within eight days, mandatory reporting to Shastri Nagar Police Station every fortnight, and a complete bar on transferring or mortgaging any property in his or his company’s name without prior judicial approval. The Court also made it clear that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority is free to enforce its decrees independently, and that the Enforcement Directorate is at liberty to continue its proceedings under existing law.

The Bench warned that failure to deposit the specified amount within the six-month window could lead to cancellation of bail. The case will now be reviewed on February 24, 2026, when the Court will assess compliance with its conditions and take a fresh view on the matter.

This judgment signals the judiciary’s intent to balance the liberty of accused developers with the pressing need to protect home buyers’ rights, offering a pragmatic framework for handling multiple complaints arising from the same transaction.

The post Supreme Court streamlines homebuyer disputes, grants builder bail and combines 81 FIRs appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Trump, and the “Birthday Book”: The Haunting Return of a Predator’s Legacy
  • A Resounding Rebuke
  • When POCSO Hides Within Confusion
  • India’s Tightrope in a Volatile World
  • Regaining Lost Ground?

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.