LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court upholds Medha Patkar’s defamation conviction, waives Rs 1 Lakh penalty

11/08/2025BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court of India on August 11, 2025, declined to overturn the criminal defamation conviction of activist and Narmada Bachao Andolan leader Medha Patkar, which had been lodged by Vinai Kumar Saxena, currently serving as the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi

A bench comprising Justice MM Sundresh and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh upheld Patkar’s conviction but scrapped the Rs 1 lakh fine previously imposed on her. Additionally, the bench relaxed her probation requirements, allowing her to furnish bonds instead of physically appearing in court at regular intervals

In November 25, 2000, a dispute was originated after a press note titled “True Face of Patriot”, was published in which Patkar accused Saxena of involvement in hawala transactions, alleged a bounced Rs 40,000 cheque from the Lalbhai Group, and characterized him as a “coward” rather than a patriot.

Medha Patekar was convicted by a trial court in In April 2025, under Section 500 of the IPC, perceiving her statements as intentionally malicious and damaging to Saxena’s reputation. The court suspended the jail sentence, granting probation and requiring a bond of ₹25,000.

On July 29, 2025, the Delhi High Court upheld both the conviction and punishment but softened the periodic attendance requirement—it allowed Patkar to appear in person, via video conference, or through counsel

During the Supreme Court hearing, Senior Advocate Sanjay Parikh argued that two key witnesses were disbelieved and that a pivotal email lacked certification under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, rendering it inadmissible.

Vinai Saxena was represented by Senior Advocate Maninder Singh who contended that at least a token fine should remain upheld. The bench, however, opted not to disturb the conviction and penalty waiver.

The post Supreme Court upholds Medha Patkar’s defamation conviction, waives Rs 1 Lakh penalty appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Trump, and the “Birthday Book”: The Haunting Return of a Predator’s Legacy
  • A Resounding Rebuke
  • When POCSO Hides Within Confusion
  • India’s Tightrope in a Volatile World
  • Regaining Lost Ground?

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.