LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

2008 Delhi serial blasts: Delhi High Court denies bail to Mansoor Asghar Peerbhoy

07/07/2026BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday rejected the bail petition of alleged Indian Mujahideen operative Mansoor Asghar Peerbhoy in connection with the 2008 Delhi serial blasts case, holding that the allegations against him disclosed a prima facie central role in the technological execution of the terror conspiracy.

The Division Bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Madhu Jain dismissed Peerbhoy’s appeal against a trial court order dated July 19, 2025, which had refused him regular bail. A detailed judgment is awaited.

The High Court observed that the material placed on record indicated a high degree of coordination, planning and logistical execution, which could have been achieved only through specialised technical expertise. The prosecution had attributed a pivotal role to the appellant in facilitating the technological aspects of the alleged terrorist conspiracy, it pointed out.

According to the prosecution, Peerbhoy was heading the media cell of the banned terror outfit and was allegedly responsible for drafting and transmitting an email titled “Message of Death” to several media organisations minutes before a series of bomb explosions struck different parts of the national capital on September 13, 2008. The email allegedly claimed responsibility for the coordinated terror attacks.

The High Court further observed that the accusations were of an extremely grave nature, particularly as the serial blasts resulted in the death of 26 persons and caused injuries to more than 100 others. Considering the seriousness of the offences and the nature of the allegations, the Bench declined to interfere with the trial court’s order refusing bail.

Peerbhoy, a software engineer by profession, was identified during the investigation as a key member of the Indian Mujahideen. According to the charge sheet filed by the Delhi Police, his alleged role was not in planting the explosive devices but in providing critical technological support to the larger criminal conspiracy.

The investigating agency alleged that he exploited unsecured Wi-Fi networks to send emails claiming responsibility for the blasts in an attempt to conceal the identities of those involved. He was also accused of developing and managing the organisation’s online communication network and digital propaganda infrastructure to facilitate its activities.

Peerbhoy was initially arrested by the Mumbai Anti-Terrorism Squad in October 2008 and was subsequently taken into custody by the Delhi Police Special Cell. He was later chargesheeted for offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code, 1860; the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; the Explosive Substances Act, 1908; and the Information Technology Act, 2000.

The post 2008 Delhi serial blasts: Delhi High Court denies bail to Mansoor Asghar Peerbhoy appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi riots 2020: High Court denies bail to Athar Khan
  • Asian Games 2026: Supreme Court to hear equestrians’ plea challenging non-selection for Dressage Team
  • 2008 Delhi serial blasts: Delhi High Court denies bail to Mansoor Asghar Peerbhoy
  • Supreme Court directs BCI to set up national legal academy for training lawyers
  • Ahmedabad serial blasts: Gujarat High Court confirms death penalty for 38, life imprisonment for 11 convicts

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.