LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Karnataka High Court reserves verdict on Bhavani Revanna plea seeking relaxation of travel restrictions

10/03/2025BlogNo Comments

The Karnataka High Court on Monday reserved its verdict on a petition filed by Bhavani Revanna, mother of Janata Dal (S) leader Prajwal Revanna, seeking relaxation in travel restrictions imposed during the grant of anticipatory bail to her in a case related to the kidnapping of a woman.

The single-judge Bench of Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur reserved its judgment in the matter after hearing the parties for around two hours.

JD S leader Prajwal Revanna has been accused of committing sexual offences against several women.

Bhavani moved the High Court seeking relaxation of a condition imposed in the anticipatory bail order that restrained her from entering her native districts of Mysuru and Hassan.

Appearing for the petitioner (A-8), Senior Advocate Sandesh J Chouta contended that the condition was imposed in the order dated June 18, 2024 on the grounds that when the anticipatory bail was granted, it included the offence under Section 364A (kidnapping for ransom) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This order was challenged before the Supreme Court, which dismissed the same.

Five conditions were granted in the anticipatory bail order, noted the Senior Counsel.

Thereafter, a charge sheet was filed and cognisance was taken on August 17, 2024, wherein Section 364A charge was dropped. This was not challenged further, he added.

Senior Advocate Chouta submitted that Section 364A was punishable with death or life imprisonment. For the rest of the offences for which cognisance has been taken, the punishment was less than seven years.

The Senior Counsel said if the petitioner waned to leave the state, she would have to take permission from the court.

The petitioner sought temporary relief to visit a temple in Hassan, which was allowed by the High Court, he added.

The post Karnataka High Court reserves verdict on Bhavani Revanna plea seeking relaxation of travel restrictions appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court: Insolvency proceedings in real estate should primarily be project-specific
  • Delhi High Court upholds BSF court’s power to try POCSO cases
  • Supreme Court to deliver interim order on Waqf Act amendments amidst constitutional challenge
  • WhatsApp messages not immune to law: Dwarka court grants damages in defamation case
  • Time For Reckoning

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.