LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Supreme Court refuses to end defamation proceedings against Kangana Ranaut over farmers protest remark

12/09/2025BlogNo Comments

The Supreme Court of India recently dealt with a petition filed by actor Kangana Ranaut seeking to quash a criminal defamation complaint pending against her in Punjab. The matter arose from a social media post made during the farmers’ protest in 2020, in which Ranaut misidentified protester Mahinder Kaur as another activist and added commentary that allegedly tarnished Kaur’s reputation.

When the case came before a Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, the Court emphasized that its role at the quashing stage is limited. The judges noted that Ranaut’s post was not a simple retweet but one that “added spice,” thereby giving it a distinct character and impact. According to the Court, whether or not such a statement meets the legal threshold for defamation cannot be determined in a summary manner—it is a matter that requires evidence and examination during trial.

The Bench also underscored that complaints disclosing a prima facie case of defamation should ordinarily proceed to trial, rather than being prematurely terminated. It observed that only after the trial court considers the facts, hears witnesses, and applies the legal defenses available under Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, can it be decided whether defamation has indeed taken place.

In light of these observations, Ranaut’s counsel chose to withdraw the petition. The Supreme Court, therefore, dismissed it as withdrawn, leaving the magistrate’s proceedings in Bathinda to continue.

By doing so, the Court reaffirmed two important principles: first, that high-profile individuals must exercise responsibility in their public statements, especially when those statements concern private citizens; and second, that questions of defamation cannot ordinarily be resolved without a proper trial. The ruling reflects the Court’s cautious approach in balancing freedom of expression with the right to reputation, making clear that public commentary which crosses into potentially defamatory territory is a matter best examined in the trial court

The post Supreme Court refuses to end defamation proceedings against Kangana Ranaut over farmers protest remark appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • “Yunus Is a Usurper”: Rights Activist Defends Hasina, Slams Bangladesh Polls
  • Opportunity Without Illusion
  • Between Tariffs and Trust: India’s High-Stakes Trade Reset with America
  • Judicial leadership falters when judges project perfection: CJI Surya Kant
  • Supreme Court seeks CBI status report on Manipur violence cases, considers shifting trial monitoring to High Courts

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.