LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi High Court directs Centre to reconsider Siddharth Varadarajan plea seeking conversion of PIO card into OCI card

12/05/2026BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday quashed a Central Government order rejecting senior journalist and founding editor of The Wire Siddharth Varadarajan’s request for conversion of his Person of Indian Origin (PIO) card into an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card, holding that the impugned decision was devoid of reasons and legally unsustainable.

The single-judge Bench of Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav observed that the rejection order suffered from absence of reasoning and failed to satisfy the requirement of a speaking order under administrative law principles. The Court restored Varadarajan’s OCI application and directed the Union government to reconsider the matter and pass a fresh reasoned order in accordance with law.

Senior Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan, appearing for Varadarajan along with Advocate Archit Krishna, challenged the Centre’s April 2 communication on the grounds that Varadarajan has longstanding roots in India and has been residing in the country since 1995 on a PIO card. He submitted that following the statutory changes in 2015, PIO cards were deemed to have merged with the OCI regime, resulting in technical and operational issues with the petitioner’s existing documentation.

During the hearing, the Court examined the impugned communication and orally remarked that it disclosed no grounds or rationale for rejection. The Bench questioned the Union government on the legal sustainability of an unreasoned administrative determination.

Advocate Anasuya Choudhury, representing the Centre, sought time to obtain instructions, submitting that the relevant notification relied upon for rejecting the application was not immediately available.

The High Court, however, held that the communication could not withstand judicial scrutiny as it failed to disclose the basis for denial of the petitioner’s claim. The Bench emphasised that recording reasons was an essential facet of administrative adjudication and necessary for effective appellate review.

Accordingly, the Court set aside the impugned communication, restored the OCI application for fresh consideration and directed the competent authority to pass a reasoned and speaking order after examining Varadarajan’s entitlement under the applicable statutory framework. It further clarified that if the petitioner remained aggrieved by the fresh decision, he would be at liberty to pursue remedies available under law.

While disposing of the writ petition, the Bench listed the matter for further hearing on May 13 in relation to Varadarajan’s interim plea concerning travel permissions pending adjudication of his OCI application.

The post Delhi High Court directs Centre to reconsider Siddharth Varadarajan plea seeking conversion of PIO card into OCI card appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of Justice Meenakshi M Rai as Chief Justice of Patna High Court
  • Centre orders Delhi Gymkhana to hand over club land for public purpose
  • When Liberty Waits Too Long
  • The Illusion of Final Victory
  • Reframing Evidence Law in Talari Naresh Verdict

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.