LAWYER SIBLING LOGO (1)
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • News
  • Updates
  • Constitution
    • Constitutional Laws
  • Laws
    • Civil Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Business Law
    • Cyber & IT Law
    • Employee Law
    • Finance Law
    • International Law
  • Special Act
    • Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act)
    • Consumer Protection Act
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Act (NDPS)
    • The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)
  • Bare Act

Delhi High Court criticises lawyers strike against enhancement of District courts pecuniary jurisdiction

25/05/2026BlogNo Comments

The Delhi High Court questioned the decision of the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) to abstain from work, observing that such strikes ultimately inconvenience litigants. The DHCBA has called for a boycott of court proceedings in protest against a proposal to enhance the pecuniary jurisdiction of district courts from Rs 2 crore to Rs 20 crore.

The bench of Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav asked a proxy counsel appearing before him about the reason behind the strike. The counsel informed the Court that the Bar Association was opposing the proposed increase in the pecuniary limits of district courts.

Expressing strong disapproval of the work boycott, Justice Kaurav remarked that abstaining from court duties is improper. He pointed out that litigants bear the brunt of such protests and urged the legal community to voice their complaints before the appropriate forums using the correct legal channels.

Justice Kaurav also took issue with proxy counsel appearing in matters without proper instructions from the arguing advocates. He questioned how they could effectively assist the bench under such circumstances, especially given the limited number of working days remaining before the court’s upcoming vacations

The issue traces back to May 2025, when the Coordination Committee of the All District Courts Bar Associations of Delhi wrote to Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal and members of the Law Commission seeking enhancement of the pecuniary jurisdiction of district courts from Rs 2 crore to Rs 20 crore.

Subsequently, a committee of Delhi High Court judges was constituted to examine the proposal, interact with stakeholders and make recommendations.

However, the DHCBA has opposed the move.

Earlier this year, on January 24, the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court had written to the Coordination Committee of the All District Courts Bar Associations, inviting representatives to participate in discussions with the judges’ committee on the proposed changes.

The post Delhi High Court criticises lawyers strike against enhancement of District courts pecuniary jurisdiction appeared first on India Legal.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court adjourns CBI Plea challenging Arvind Kejriwal’s discharge in Excise policy case
  • Delhi High Court gives Centre time to respond to Siddharth Varadarajan’s affidavit on bail disclosure
  • NEET-UG 2026 controversy: Supreme Court calls for accountability from NTA and monitoring committee
  • Delhi High Court criticises lawyers strike against enhancement of District courts pecuniary jurisdiction
  • Supreme Court refuses immediate intervention in petition over social media use of court remarks

Recent Comments

  1. Phone Tracking In India - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  2. Section 437A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA
  3. The Evolution of Indian Penal Code 1860: Key Provisions and Relevance Today - lawyer Sibling on The Constitution of INDIA

Follow us for more

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
Instagram
DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved © 2023
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.